D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Cool post, thanks. I try not to be negative but I've been a lot of cool promising technology that hasn't seen its potential realised so I tend to ground my expectations on what things have been shown to do, not what it may be able to do if they fix issues, X, Y and Z.The possibilities are endless. Sure you can do a lot of the things with a combination of devices. But then modern life is full of things that let you consolidate actions into once device. After all, wasn't that the attraction of the PC? And tablets? And smartphones? This has the potential to move all of that onto one device.
I think the biggest challenge to the image generation technology is the muted/dull image and low resolution - which is something a number of people lucky enough to get a personal demo noted. Maybe they can improve this but what quality video would you really get from a holo projected 100" TV? Or even a cinema-sized projected screen in a warehouse? When I look at my TV, currently showing BBC News 24, will I be able to read the news captions clearly? How about the clock? Or the news ticker? What about subtitles of TV and movies?
How about interacting with information. Wouldn't it be cool if emails appeared Harry Potter-style like flying envelopes and you can grab it and open it in front of you. Will the resolution be sufficient to make the letters readable without using a large virtual typeface size? How about responding. Virtual keyboard appears? Can you see which letters are on the keys?
I think their demonstrations showed objects, rather than actual information, for a this reason. That doesn't take away from how cool that Minecraft thing was and I'd dearly love to have a play on this thing. But cool isn't the same thing as useful.