Well I can't reproduce it right now either after I tried launching an application... LuXr has used almost 8 mins of CPU time though, which is only topped by firefox. (And I have had it open maybe 10 times for a few sec a time.) So it has defently used quite a few CPU resourses while not being used. I'll keep you updated on the issue...
I can see that priority is set to realtime... Is this nessesary? (I guess the animations are the reason you do this) Its probably why my media player skips when writing a lot in the LuXr field.
Memory isn't a big issue for me if it's just released to the OS on request... I guess that might be the nature of managed applications. (Haven't written anything managed myself besides java yet, so not sure how .net behaves) As long as you know that memory is probably one of peoples concerns since it's program that runs all the time...
I can see that priority is set to realtime... Is this nessesary? (I guess the animations are the reason you do this) Its probably why my media player skips when writing a lot in the LuXr field.
Memory isn't a big issue for me if it's just released to the OS on request... I guess that might be the nature of managed applications. (Haven't written anything managed myself besides java yet, so not sure how .net behaves) As long as you know that memory is probably one of peoples concerns since it's program that runs all the time...