Peter Griffin
Newcomer
Got pictures or at least model number on those LGA2011 board, I want to pre-order mine ?
CPUZ says C0/C1, dunno which. Or if it's one and the same. It's Model A, Stepping 4, bought the CPU in february or march 2009 I believe. Not sure when it first came out though.
Like I mentioned, I don't follow LGA2011 that closely since my current system is still more than good enough, but if you can stomach the Swedish, here's MSI X79A-GD65 8D, or the Gigabyte X79 G1.Assassin 2, they both look pretty cool (don't ask me WTH is up with those weird product names though, because I don't have the first clue... )Got pictures or at least model number on those LGA2011 board
Mainly just future proofing. I don't like the idea of buying a new, very expensive CPU that doesn't support the latest connectivity tech.What's the deal with PCIe 3.0 ? I thought performance wise, it's pretty small improvement with those PCIe iteration. Or can't PCIe 3.0 board fit in PCIe 2.0 ?
Ah, I see. Well, it's an i7 for sure, so C0 it is then. It's running very well with 1660MHz DDR3 by the way, validated or not. I gotta say, Intel absolutely builds some really top-notch memory controllers.They didn't change the Model/Stepping code for some reason, so CPU-Z can't differentiate, C1 was validated for DDR3-1333 which i7 never officially supported.
Well I missed the information about the latest one...Asking for alus in "SNB-E" doesn't really make much sense though as it's certainly exactly the same for any Sandy Bridge cpu...
It's for the server/HPC applications mostly. With the increase of the memory bandwidth, the data pre-fetch becomes more efficient and that requires more cache to utilize it.Why is there so much cache on this beast? Wouldn't that area be better spent on more logic? It seems like there's hardly any difference at all between the 12 and 15MB variants.