Is the MBX more powerfull than PSP?

[one]

So far Sony+Toshiba's 90 nm process seems to be working rather well for them. Of course in your dreamy world SCE is using the worst manufacturing process to date.

Yeah kinda like how EE+GS@90nm isn't fully 90nm.

So you still believe in the hoax. If it's not 90nm, Intel doesn't have 90nm either.
http://www.siliconstrategies.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=17601836

 

[PC-Engine]

I think the jury is still out on that one...

 

[Guden Oden]

Guden, we're not saying someone will put these parts together to form a complete console. We're just saying the technology is available separately and are equal or superior in their respective categories with regards to technology.

Yes, and so WHAT? If it isn't available in console form, what does it matter if it's superior?

Look, man... By the time you take your now superior tech and have developed it into a console, created games development software, designed a case, human interface, screen, connectors and peripherals etc like Sony has done with the PSP, your superior tech won't be superior anymore. It's the way things work in this industry, you should know that already.

However, instead of acknowledging this fact, you just use it as an opportunity to beat up Sony and crap on the most powerful handheld games system the world has ever seen. It's pure trolling, and I wish you'd stop. It's getting mighty annoying with your constant Sony-bashing.

 

[PC-Engine]

Look, man... By the time you take your now superior tech and have developed it into a console, created games development software, designed a case, human interface, screen, connectors and peripherals etc like Sony has done with the PSP, your superior tech won't be superior anymore. It's the way things work in this industry, you should know that already.

Um...no...SH-5 and MBX Pro have been available for awhile already. If a company decided they wanted to release a portable in 2004 they would've started developing it over a year ago working closely with Hitachi and IMGTEC so that by fall of 2004 it would use current SH-5 and MBX tech.

For example if Nintendo or MS wanted to release a high performance portable console in 2006 they would start working with SH-5 and MBX Pro today and have the final hardware use an SH-6 and MBX Pro Series 2.

You don't take current tech then release it years later if you're competing with other products, that's just dumb. You also use emulators of final hardware if needed.

 

[V3]

Um...no...SH-5 and MBX Pro have been available for awhile already. If a company decided they wanted to release a portable in 2004 they would've started developing it over a year ago working closely with Hitachi and IMGTEC so that by fall of 2004 it would use current SH-5 and MBX tech.

How come Nintendo didn't use those for NDS ?

 

[London Geezer]

Um...no...SH-5 and MBX Pro have been available for awhile already. If a company decided they wanted to release a portable in 2004 they would've started developing it over a year ago working closely with Hitachi and IMGTEC so that by fall of 2004 it would use current SH-5 and MBX tech.

How come Nintendo didn't use those for NDS ?

Because they're superior to technological advances!! Because it's all about the gameplay!! They could easily make a handheld 2x as powerful as PSP, with a battery half the size of the PSP one and with 20h autonomy!! But that would hold the market back!!11!11!1!


[/sarcasm]

 

[PC-Engine]

Um...no...SH-5 and MBX Pro have been available for awhile already. If a company decided they wanted to release a portable in 2004 they would've started developing it over a year ago working closely with Hitachi and IMGTEC so that by fall of 2004 it would use current SH-5 and MBX tech.

How come Nintendo didn't use those for NDS ?

Maybe because GBA SP is outselling every console on the planet?