Or just good marketing? Is this something we should accept? Or should we burn them at the stake?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRVAVdF8HLc
Here we have Sony Computer Entertainment Vice President, Jack Tretton, lying and saying Killzone is "definitely" realtime and running on PS3 devkits.
Here's another case, Interview on the Lair E3 2006 footage:
Why couldn't they just state that is was CG? Why would Sony and Factor 5 even have a discussion about this? It's obvious they wanted to give the ruse that this was indeed how the game looked.
Should consumers have to second guess every single screenshot/video released?
I'm personally getting sick of all this "bait and switch" action going on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRVAVdF8HLc
Here we have Sony Computer Entertainment Vice President, Jack Tretton, lying and saying Killzone is "definitely" realtime and running on PS3 devkits.
Here's another case, Interview on the Lair E3 2006 footage:
So was the trailer they showed at E3 realtime or CGI?
I was waiting for that to come up. In fact I'm surprised it took this long. The company and Sony anticipated this and we've been told to not answer the question. I can give you some idea of the current graphics though. Remeber the screenshot that surfaced from the GDC presentation? That was entirely real-time, in the engine, as in someone was actually playing the level(in fact I've played that level).
Why couldn't they just state that is was CG? Why would Sony and Factor 5 even have a discussion about this? It's obvious they wanted to give the ruse that this was indeed how the game looked.
Should consumers have to second guess every single screenshot/video released?
I'm personally getting sick of all this "bait and switch" action going on.
Last edited by a moderator: