Please forgive me if this has already been posted, but I found it amusing:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38397
Reader comment:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38397
Reader comment:
Subject: Nvidia covert blog marketing
Nvidia's covert marketing attempts are indeed distasteful, but this contest is nothing different than any other that has been conducted for other products for quite a long time. I would also state that their marketing is no more distasteful than any other company's practices.
One interesting thing that has never been noted in the "controversy" is exactly where the news about their covert marketing strategies originated. The news first broke on the Beyond3d.com message board. An item of interest is that the individual who "broke" this story had received free ATI hardware in the past. In effect, the pot called the kettle black, generated a large stink, and then quietly acknowledged his own receipt of payola from the ATI side! The Nvidia-side "informant" was never identified.
Interestingly enough, the editor-in-chief of Beyond3d.com at that time, went on to work for ATI in their Public Relations department. It isn't a large cognitive leap to do the math; he went from covertly being a PR shill to officially being one. Amidst the Nvidia bashing, none of this was ever mentioned.
While ATI may have claimed that it was not in their DNA to use such underhanded practices, the fact remains that they very much used some that were even more underhanded - or at least their paid shills did.
Let's hope that AMD leads by example, now that they are the collective of DAAMIT. An excellent place to start would be to require that individuals-turned-evangelists disclose their own past payola benefits. At least the playing field would be even in the mudslinging. Even better, perhaps it would encourage both sides to release products that stand on their own merits without the shenanigans that have plagued the community.
Mel Steele