11-12% faster. Not that much.
11-12% faster. Not that much.
That'll be enough to pretty much equal the i3 3220 in most of the cpu benchmarks the 5800K lost before while laying a huge smackdown on igp.
Maybe, but the really important part is the 25~35W notebook chips, at least financially.
Honestly, if they couldn't do it with Trinity vs. Ivybridge then I think that's a lost case..
Yap, that's it.
LV/ULV Trinity was much better placed against Ivybrige for ultrabooks - since it had superior GPU performance and good-enough CPU
All things point to Richland having a GPU performance similar to Haswell's GT3, where CPU will be a major step behind.
Yap, that's it.If OEMs dumped Trinity in favor of Ivybridge for all their ultrabooks, why would they ever choose to adopt Richland instead of Haswell, or even Ivybridge + discrete nVidia?
I don't know how ULV GT3 will perform since low power models are usually TDP limited but the higher TDP GT3 variants from Haswell are surely much faster than Richlands mobile top GPU.
As I suggested in the other thread, the A6-5200 (Kabini) would beat the A4-6300 (Richland) in graphics. That's very close though. I wonder if that's 18W or 25W Kabini...
11-12% faster. Not that much.
Not really. The top end GT3 with edram is only expected to be about double the performance of the HD4000 which puts it in the ballpark of Richland A10-6800K.
A10-6800K is desktop only. Mobile variants are much slower, so not really a useful comparison. If you say GT3 will double then Richland is far away from this.
Yeah I missed your mobile qualifier in the last post.
If we talk about GT3, we talk about mobile, easy as that.