ninelven said:Lance Armstrong has a VO2 max of 84, which is why he dominates the TDF.
Crisidelm said:Armstrong is a real great champion, but Merckx is still the best ever been: he used to race almost all year long, and raced to win every time. And he usually did win...
Maybe Armstrong could race the Tour de France AND the Giro d'Italia next year...that would be interesting.
Evil_Cloud said:Crisidelm said:Armstrong is a real great champion, but Merckx is still the best ever been: he used to race almost all year long, and raced to win every time. And he usually did win...
Maybe Armstrong could race the Tour de France AND the Giro d'Italia next year...that would be interesting.
That's my point, Mercx rode everthing, and won (nearly) everything there was to win, Lance only rides the Tour and only wins the tour.
See the difference?
Im not up on my cycling etiquite. So can you explain why this is bad. I thought the point was to win the tour.Crisidelm said:Yesterday Armstrong acted really bad: he chased a rider (Simeoni) who was trying to pull back on the leading fugitive group, and once they reached them, Armstrong told the fugitive riders that if Simeoni did not stop he'd not either, so that the "peloton" would chase them all the way (because Ullrich, Basso etc cannot afford to let Armstrong go ahead like that) until eventually got back on them. In the end Simeoni had to stop (and so Armstrong did too) and wait for the main group, to let the others keep on...
what if the next day they had to play the team again. by hitting the batter you _might_ cause the batter to not play as well tomorrow.Crisidelm said:Let's see: do you know baseball? What would you think of a pitcher whose team is leading by 12 point in the last inning, 2 are already out, and he hits intentionally the man at bat because he doesn't like that guy, and after all, he just gives a base, no big deal?
Just to give the big-picture impression, it's not a perfect parallelism I know...