Futuremark Publishes Guidelines for Driver Optimizations

[Nick[FM]]

In every newspost about drivers we always let the readers know what the drivers are. Beta, leaked, official or official WHQL. We always endorse users who want to use any beta or leaked driver to do it with caution, and strongly suggest to only use WHQL drivers. And as Neeyik said, we do not distribute any drivers. We only post news about them, and link to them for people who maybe want to update theirs. I personally do not see the conflict here. As long as there is enough information about the drivers in the news, people know what to do and what they are about to download.

 

[madshi]

]In every newspost about drivers we always let the readers know what the drivers are. Beta, leaked, official or official WHQL. We always endorse users who want to use any beta or leaked driver to do it with caution, and strongly suggest to only use WHQL drivers. And as Neeyik said, we do not distribute any drivers. We only post news about them, and link to them for people who maybe want to update theirs. I personally do not see the conflict here. As long as there is enough information about the drivers in the news, people know what to do and what they are about to download.

Perhaps you could just add a warning to the news post, if a specific driver is not (yet) FutureMark approved.

 

[kyleb]

just mentioning the issue when linking drivers which are known to break futuremark's guidelines at least bring some sense of legitimacy to the situation.