Unknown Soldier
Veteran
Hanners said:
Eish .. ye forgot Nvidia doesn't do HDR and AA+AF
US
Futuremark: 3DMark06
- Thread starter trinibwoy
- Start date
Eish .. ye forgot Nvidia doesn't do HDR and AA+AF
US
Martin Eddy
Regular
Just finished downloading from Techconnect
3DMark Score: 4225
SM 2.0 Score: 1706
SM 3.0 Score: 1704
CPU Score : 1609
3DMark Score: 4225
SM 2.0 Score: 1706
SM 3.0 Score: 1704
CPU Score : 1609
Would this be it?
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1297
Getting well over 2MB/sec, so should be fine..
EDIT: Substituted link with a page that also shows the password.
_
K
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1297
Getting well over 2MB/sec, so should be fine..
EDIT: Substituted link with a page that also shows the password.
_
K
Last edited by a moderator:
The NDA is up, so it should appear on FutureMark's page any minute now.
In the meantime, you can check out my review at Elite Bastards if it tickles your fancy.
EDIT: FutureMark's download page is up now.
In the meantime, you can check out my review at Elite Bastards if it tickles your fancy.
EDIT: FutureMark's download page is up now.
Joe DeFuria
Legend
Reverend said:
And Futuremark would respond "No, you dumbass journalists can't handle 1 number properly...we're taking a big risk with two...wouldn't dare confuse you poor sods with more..."
Unknown Soldier said:
They are using over clocked GTX in that review. And its interesting to note that very last sentence in that review tells you to check their engine for prices on the GTX...
While I am sure this does not change the results that much, this does make you wonder...
Graphics_Krazy
Newcomer
That is odd.
I've also seen scores where a X1600XT walks all over a X850XT
Maybe Futuremark released this prematurely??
Surprised AA is still not default - especially in 2006.
Anyone see any sites with that data - it's of more interest to me.
I've also seen scores where a X1600XT walks all over a X850XT
Maybe Futuremark released this prematurely??
Surprised AA is still not default - especially in 2006.
Anyone see any sites with that data - it's of more interest to me.
3DMark06 has multivendor "DST" and "PCF" support.tEd said:I guess there is alot potential not used for x1300/x1600 and x1900 as i assume 3dmark06 won't use the 24bit dst and fetch4 functionality for the shadowmap rendering.
Also if they use fp16 filtering for hdr rendering nvidia will have an advantage as ati don't support fp16 text
Bunch o' numbers here http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=199&type=overview
ATI pretty thoroughly trounced, particularly X1800xl.
Couple questions: 1) Have we figured out the performance constraints yet with this one? Can we finally retire "vertex fetch limited" to the ash heap of history? 2). How much optimizing do we figure the IHV's have in their current drivers for it? Are we expecting a big jump next round, or the little bitty incremental increases over time?
ATI pretty thoroughly trounced, particularly X1800xl.
Couple questions: 1) Have we figured out the performance constraints yet with this one? Can we finally retire "vertex fetch limited" to the ash heap of history?
2). How much optimizing do we figure the IHV's have in their current drivers for it? Are we expecting a big jump next round, or the little bitty incremental increases over time?
Jawed
Legend
From the screenshots of the "old" game tests, it's striking how the "old-fashioned" horrible "HDR lighting effect" has been transformed into something that looks a lot more realistic.
This is a major major plus in my view. Hopefully it'll lead people to understand what HDR really should look like. And the ghastly junk we've seen in quite a few games will gradually fall out of fashion.
Ah well, pity my X800XT can't do much - downloading anyhow to see what I can see.
Jawed
This is a major major plus in my view. Hopefully it'll lead people to understand what HDR really should look like. And the ghastly junk we've seen in quite a few games will gradually fall out of fashion.
Ah well, pity my X800XT can't do much - downloading anyhow to see what I can see.
Jawed
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=235
Score : 4636 with stock 7800GTX/512 + 3500+ and 2gb ram.
Score : 4636 with stock 7800GTX/512 + 3500+ and 2gb ram.
I love the credits!!!!
IbaneZ said:NVIDIA and a dual core AMD is the way to go i guess.
My "old" FX-55@2.8 GHz is worthless in this test. So is my X1800.
An X2 3800+ and a 7800 GT murders my score. BS.
Yea my cpu is also killing my score. Is it possible with the Pro version to skip the cpu tests? They take so long
