Metalmurphy
Newcomer
I find it impressive that a 2 month old expensive console sold almost as much as the 1 year old 360. I think the future is bright for the PS3. I'm pretty sure around March the sales are gonna increase.
I would say doubling the price in 1 generation is arrogant as you can get. Competition has done nothing to keep prices down at sony land. The only way for prices to come down is sony to take a beating. Sony brought all this on themselves out of greed and arrogance. Saying things like the first 5 million would sell with no games or people will get a second job to get a PS3 are the most arrogant things ever said.
I would say the last decade has been pretty much a sony monopoly it is time someone else had a turn. All sony had to do was launch without blue ray and none of this would be happening. A 299-399 PS3 would of destroyed the 360.
I would say doubling the price in 1 generation is arrogant as you can get. Competition has done nothing to keep prices down at sony land. The only way for prices to come down is sony to take a beating. Sony brought all this one themselves out of greed and arrogance. Saying things like the first 5 million would sell with no games or people will get a second job to get a PS3 are the most arrogant things ever said.
I would say the last decade has been pretty much a sony monopoly it is time someone else had a turn. All sony had to do was launch without blue ray and none of this would be happening. A 299-399 PS3 would of destroyed the 360.
You know what I will benefit from? All consoles being a success, competition drives prices down and innovation forward. Some of you are so hoping for Sony to go bankrupt you forget they are the principle reason MS has pushed so hard in the console area. But if you guys like MS monopolies (Office, Windows) so be it.
I honestly don't think BR and HD-DVD are the big selling factors of these systems. They are still primarily game consoles, and most people will buy them to play games with the media playback being far secondary. Most people have no interest in the format war and will pick up a next gen disc player when they're cheap, like they did with DVD.
I also don't understand people that say the Wii cannot be compared to the 360 or the PS3 because it's not hi-def or provides different capabilities. All three are gaming machines and they are all competing directly with one another. In fact, the PSP and the DS compete directly with those systems. People have an entertainment budget, and if you have X number of dollars set aside for gaming, money spent on any console or handheld is going to come out of that pool.
PS3 and the Wii have been out far too short a period of time to make any predictions. All we know is that they look like they are not going to flop.
Run a company lately ? ;-)
I think there are ''plenty'' of Wii games to keep most people busy. I've got zelda, Red steel (wich is alot better than reviewers claim, they probably didnt spend more than 5 minutes on the game), Monkey ball and exite truck and all are pretty decent games. Ofcouse no triple A except for zelda but enough quility to not get you bored. And March also has some decent titels coming out so its not that there isnt anything decent available on Wii. The only problem is that most are just old games with new controlls trown in.
The current sales of the Wii however should be changing that. With that in mind, I'm looking at E3 to be the true barometer of 3rd party support.
Why do you guys insist on attaching human emotions to giant companies and regurgitating some obscure quote an executive said years ago who doesn't even speak English well? I guess I don't follow Sony's PR gaffes from 2005 closely so I can judge the product and not the "arrogance" of a behemoth company.
$400 360 + $40 VGA + $100 Wi-fi + $50 Live + $20 rechargeable batteries = $610
$600 PS3 + $7 HDMI = $607
So dance around like a monkey trying to spin sales numbers if you like, but no one is paying for your viral marketing so maybe take a break once in a while.
DVD had benefits in every way over VHS.
1) Significantly Less bulk
2) Extras like behind-the-scenes, trailers, minigames, cross functionality with the computer, etc
3) Significantly better image quality and sound quality, allowing movie-like experience at home
4) No degraded playback despite multiple viewings
5) Multi-disc changers
HD-DVD and Blu-Ray simply don't have the same benefits over DVD to make a mass market migration appealing at this time.
arrogance != confidence.
Not to mention only a fool would be as arrogant as they have been in public.
Any company with as questionable a product offering as ps3 given the maret conditions cannot afford to be arrogant.
When selling to cosumers you tout your advantages. In some cases you acknowledge and downplay your competition. You don't charge double your prior offering with ulterior motives and tell your customers to get a second job to do so while also expecting your customers to not only buy your product en masse but to do so without games. This in a market with two strong alternatives.
I don't know how it is in you guy's market but historically in my area there has been one cabletv offering. They provided questionable service and constant rate hikes. Recently when complaining about the service the representative gave a flippant answer, "What are you going to do? Go without cable?". DirectTV had a new customer that day.
Again you go way to far with your insults and hyporbole. Believe it or not, the vast majority of posters on this board are mature and intelligent enough to realize that the competition benefits the consumer, and that the best result is an even playing field all around.
These people who want to see Sony go bankrupt exist only in your head I think, or maybe over at GameFAQS or GAF where you seem to have migrated from...
I've been a long supporter of 360, it's franchises, and the value it offered in 2005, but no way in the world would I ever want to see an MS dominated concole market.
I doubt masterdisaster is a figment of our imagination there are defiantly few fanboys here that whish Sony’s death, dislike MS or hate Nintendo with a passion.
What's so questionable about PS3 ? I play Resistance for 3-4 hours daily on the average (Never had so much fun in FPS since Halo 1 was released). Am waiting for more games and features, but it looks like a solid product to me.
It's called skimming the market. It depends on Sony's corporate objectives (and their timeline). You're looking at the world from your own perspective, and that's fair; but it doesn't mean the world has to follow you (The same goes for Sony).
As you pointed out, Sony needs more games (although Resistance is a great one !), but launch game availability has little to do with long term pricing. Give the devs more time and I'm sure even better games will come. As for whether you need to work a second job, it's your call. I don't think the Sony execs are telling you to do that.
The Jan sales number doesn't surprise me at all. Perhaps it's your 500K expectation that is detached from reality ?
A dominating company will typically try to leverage on their position (Sony or otherwise). As you can see, the competitions are not push overs.
Tie ratio for PS3 is over 2. Amazing!
In and of itself, yes, it does what it supposed to do. However the price/experience for a gamer is questionable when compared to other offerings available. Add games selection and it becomes decidedly more questionable. Not that everyone will question it. Almost 2 million agree with you. The other 98+ million aren't convinced yet.
More games will come. I question whether it will be a case of too little too late for ps3 though.
As for my 2nd job -I would get another job, but I'm too busy playing xb360. Sucks for Sony.:smile:
Agreed - my prediction was way off. I assumed the lack of systems on the shelf ment they sold out. I also assumed that they had at least one more shipment since last year.
Why did you pay $40 for the vga cables and only $7 for HDMI? Just curious as one can get the vga cables for much cheaper online, just like HDMI cables.