I think he means the cost of 130nm fabrication/fab hardware despite having newer process technologies available.
If that is the case, there is some difficulty in getting like for like comparisons.
Wafer costs are higher with the more advanced processes, but it also depends on what extra features were added.
Large wafer size, copper interconnects, low-K dielectrics, high-K gate dielectrics, SOI, strained silicon, and other features add to the cost of a given process node.
A lot of the older processes were put to pasture prior to these coming into vogue.
On the other hand, some of these "extras" are needed to make the more advanced processes usable.
The more involved process control machines and systems needed for decent yields are a worry older nodes worried less about, because their larger geometries were more resistant to process variation, leakage, and quantum effects.
Mask sets, light sources, steppers, and the chemical mixes are significantly more complex with smaller geometries, so that is also a cost older nodes have less of.
The rise in fab building costs can attest to this.
It is also the case that there are cheap old fabs out there that are either for sale or have old equipment that can be bought relatively cheaply.
I don't know about getting new equipment for an old node. The machines in general should be cheaper, but I don't know how much inventory there is on such parts or whether they are being manufactured for very old nodes.