Bloom like Condemned no HDR
The demo that was released was a pre-E3 build. Most of the textures have been replaced with the higher resolution textures that would be available to people with a high-end PC. Anything outstanding is being evaluated and will be included at the highest resolution we can get them in at without sacrificing performance.
As for framerate issues (which I have noticed a few comments) in the E3 demo during heavy firefights and with lots of grenades going off you could experience some issues. But, this happened on the PC also (unless you had an ultra-fast rig). These issues have been cleared up and its pretty solid - no matter how much stuff is thrown at the screen the framerate is maintained.
9.1 definitely seems a tad high if it's more or less the same as the PC version.
Is this one of those exclusive review situations where they are inevitably inflated? I haven't seen any other reviews of it.
Should be a decent fps to pick up if you haven't played the PC version though! Sounds like it's a rather good port too.
9.1 is fine for Fear, the fact that it's basically the same as the PC-version shouldn't make any difference to the score it receives.
9.1 is fine for Fear, the fact that it's basically the same as the PC-version shouldn't make any difference to the score it receives.
I'm saying the PC version wouldn't deserve a 9.1 either. The game wasn't that good.
I'm saying the PC version wouldn't deserve a 9.1 either. The game wasn't that good.
IGN gave the PC version a 9.5 in graphics iirc
The 360's FEAR graphics score isn't my issue -- it's the total score that seems a bit high. There are a lot of patently better games that IGN have given a lower score to. I suppose it's an issue with review sites in general -- lots of inconsistencies!
isnt this more of an opinion and preference? after all a review is just that persons opinion
The 360's FEAR graphics score isn't my issue -- it's the total score that seems a bit high.
Huh? Textures != effects.
they turned up all the settings