hasanahmad
Banned
Is it less because of difference in architecture or am i ignoring the EDRAM Transistors
Hardknock said:No offense, but sometimes people at GAF can be such IDIOTS. Check out this thread:
http://www.new.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=47116
The OP doesn't even have the transister count for Xenos right!!! And then he later states the RSX will have 400 million transisters! When it's been officially confirmed to only have 300 million! People are just CLUELESS, and everyone there is just going along with it. Geez...
SanGreal said:That thread is from 5/13/05 when not much was known about either chip
Hardknock said:haha, I see now. That forum never seizes to amaze me though.
Then again, the NV40 has a lot of transistors that go unused most of the time, and others that just don't work (Video Processor WMV acceleration), so...MoHonRi said:I would say that the transistor that are dedicated to the daughter die and it's logic do matter. A lot of work goes on there. So while it is a different design from other architectures, a lot of thought went in to where to invest transisters. I would't discount them because it is 'just' eDRAM.
MoH
Sonic said:And just where have these differeing numbers come from BenQ? I would like to see the sources for the varying of the transistor count.
BenQ said:I don't have the links to what your asking for, but I have read a WIDE range of transistor counts for the Xenos. Months ago, IGN was claiming it was 150 million. And then with Dave's article there was confusion about EXACTLY how many transistors comprise the daughter die. Has the Xenos article been editied since then?
ATI have clarified the daughter, eDRAM/sample logic die count to be 105M transistors.
Read the article. There is a pic of the package in there, with the VPU at the center and the eDRAM next to it.BTOA said:Is the Edram side of the GPU a core all by itself, which makes the Xenos GPU a two core GPU setup?