Do You Believe In Magic. Pretty Wierd little find

I heard what sounded like a fuse blowing in my head and smelled smoke faintly upon reading this threads contents.
 
OpenGL guy said:
This isn't strictly correct. The proper form is:
d/dx e^x = e^x
Now, the question is, can you take the differential equation:
d/dx y(x) = y(x)

...with the initial condition that y(0) = 1, and prove that the answer is e^x, without using anything you know about the definition of the function e^x? That is, can you prove that the function that satisfies the above differential equation is some number to the power of x, with that number being forced to be the number we define as e?

Edit: This isn't just to OpenGL guy, I don't want to put him on the spot :) Just an open question to anybody out there.
 
Chalnoth said:
Now, the question is, can you take the differential equation:
d/dx y(x) = y(x)

...with the initial condition that y(0) = 1, and prove that the answer is e^x, without using anything you know about the definition of the function e^x? That is, can you prove that the function that satisfies the above differential equation is some number to the power of x, with that number being forced to be the number we define as e?

Edit: This isn't just to OpenGL guy, I don't want to put him on the spot :) Just an open question to anybody out there.
Code:
y = f(x)
y = y'
1 = y'/y
antiderivative (1) = antiderivative(y'/y)
x + c = ln(y)
y = e^(x+c)
Since f(0) = 1, c = 0
y = e^x
 
Chalnoth said:
Yup, but you would be surprised at how many people you can ask that to in a bar/pub and have them answer "half a pound". ;)


There were a few more dumb ones like that, I'll try and remember them.
 
OpenGL guy said:
Code:
y = f(x)
y = y'
1 = y'/y
antiderivative (1) = antiderivative(y'/y)
x + c = ln(y)
y = e^(x+c)
Since f(0) = 1, c = 0
y = e^x
Yeah, but you're still using what you know about e^x in that derivation, I think. You may not like that, but I think it's a bit fun to consider trying to do this without using logarithms or exponentials. It's a challenge, I think, but quite possible :)
 
Chalnoth said:
Yeah, but you're still using what you know about e^x in that derivation, I think. You may not like that, but I think it's a bit fun to consider trying to do this without using logarithms or exponentials. It's a challenge, I think, but quite possible :)
Here's a goofy idea then:
Code:
y = f(x)
y = y'
f(0) = 1 and, hence, f^(n)(0) = 1  (nth derivative)
Take the Taylor series at 0:
y = f(0) + f'(0)x/1! + f''(0)x^2/2! + ...
y = 1 + x/1! + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + ...
Note that this is the Taylor series for e^x.
 
If your mother was a washer and your father was a dryer, how many pancakes does it take to cover a doghouse?


Banana.

Because oranges don't have handlebars.
 
Anyway, I'll go ahead and answer my own question. Here's the method I'll use:

First, let's take the differential equation and expand it in terms of the definition of a derivative:

dy/dx = (y(x+dx) - y(x))/dx

Now, since dy/dx = y(x), we can rearrange the above equation as:

y(x+dx) = y(x)(1+dx)

...so now we have a way to get from a position y(x) to a position y(x+dx): multiply by (1+dx). So far, the above equation is only valid in the limit as dx approaches zero, but let's see if we can't find the value of y at some significant distance from x. For this, I'll define:
dx = 1/n (with the limit that n->infinity)

...and claim that we want to move a total of deltax. In order to move by 1, we would have to multiply by (1+1/n) n times. In order to move by deltax, we would have to multiply by (1+1/n) (n*deltax) times. So, we have:

y(x + deltax) = y(x) (1+1/n)^(n*deltax)
...or:
y(x + deltax) = y(x) [(1+1/n)^n]^deltax

We can use the initial condition y(0) = 1 to write:
y(x) = [(1+1/n)^n]^x

Now, in the limit that n->infinity, the expression [(1+1/n)^n] is just a number, a number that happens to be equal to e :)

Anyway, I like to ask this kind of question because I'd like to know if I could do calculus with special functions if the only thing that I knew was basic algebra.
 
zsouthboy said:
If your mother was a washer and your father was a dryer, how many pancakes does it take to cover a doghouse?


Banana.

Because oranges don't have handlebars.
That's a bit, uh, odd.
 
think of a two digit number below 50 , where both digits are odd and different to each other.




















is the number ............ 37 ? ( assuming i've written the question right,, 50% of people say that, iirc theres 4 possibles but 37 is the one most people pick).
 
Back
Top