This isn't the political/ethical discussion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa8d/4fa8d66aaa745eab9b5b51a1451f976ae3762351" alt="1698394018312.png 1698394018312.png"
Casesdefinitely appear to be heading down in England. Lots of people with heavy colds and not a huge amount of other viruses around it seems, so cases probably higher than being measured. Well, certainly higher than being measured as they aren't measuring much! A correlation between number of cases and reduction in tests makes it hard to gauge reality, although the numbers in the graph and plot don't coincide with a 40% change. the wiggle in testing counts around September explains the apparent short wave in cases at that time - peak and trough were caused by sampling, not viral spread.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b0e1/9b0e1ef8e58312b10ea22b0528f183e4bead0478" alt="1698394276353.png 1698394276353.png"
PCR +ve is dropping
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2746c/2746c47d44cf6f4d9850572936482a429e13f64c" alt="1698394479047.png 1698394479047.png"
Is there any approximate measure that'll actual give an indicator of broad population infection rate? I don't think the ONS is still tracking and reporting their estimates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa8d/4fa8d66aaa745eab9b5b51a1451f976ae3762351" alt="1698394018312.png 1698394018312.png"
Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b0e1/9b0e1ef8e58312b10ea22b0528f183e4bead0478" alt="1698394276353.png 1698394276353.png"
PCR +ve is dropping
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2746c/2746c47d44cf6f4d9850572936482a429e13f64c" alt="1698394479047.png 1698394479047.png"
Is there any approximate measure that'll actual give an indicator of broad population infection rate? I don't think the ONS is still tracking and reporting their estimates.