It wasn't total bullshit. The code name was right in 2011.
But all the technical information was total bullshit.
It wasn't total bullshit. The code name was right in 2011.
No, clearly he knew nothing about the PS4 other than the codename...doesn't mean it didn't start the rumours.Are you just ignoring how the Sony PS4 info was total BS?
Here's the quote;8 core i7 to a 8 core jaguar mobile cpu, yeah pretty close.
Not really, he was right about the CPU being 8-core 64 bit, bluray, 500GB HDD, 8GB flash, the 24/7 connectivity and cloud-based connectivity. All this way before any announcement.But all the technical information was total BS.
Not really
eh.Not sure where this would belong, but its more of a rumor perhaps. Said to be from a dev on BC for PS5/next xbox. Also the notion of atleast 2 years to next-gen.
https://www.unilad.co.uk/gaming/ps5-and-next-gen-xbox-will-likely-be-backwards-compatible-says-dev/
I was talking on the Sony side.
Personally I feel Arkham nights post history is such that I wouldn't put too much faith on the stuff he brings here... His spec sheet seems to be recycled elements of often talked about specs (on the high end of the range)...with some random BS thrown in, like the US launch pricing from random EU developer at this far from launch point in time. Throw in the obligatory references to CGI-bringing visuals and in general juvenile output in many of his posts. Not much to see here imo.
On the whole, the conspiracy about controlled leaks is.. unlikely and incorrect. If there are real leaks, there are people breaking NDAs and risking their jobs to leak it if they are caught. The information can come out of a variety of channels like contractors, developers, retailers etc and usually that information with partners is limited. Leakers need to be careful about canary traps, where they tell each group something a little bit different from the others. This enables the companies to locate the general group of their leaker and go from there. a prominent star wars film ends in such a way.Oh right, well obviously (in restrospect)...I thought you were questioning the rest.
The question is, were people fed lies by Sony? I remember the whole lead-up being about the PS4 being under-powered (largely because my mate at work constantly ribbed me about it), and then bam - the tables were reversed and the whole RAM (doubling) and price were just icing with a cherry on top.
At that point MS must have been completely on the canvas.
Does it? It looks like only thing that thing has right is the codenames.
Did you not see my list? Everything about Xbox One was correct bar the RAM and wrongly assuming an i7 CPU. Other that that it's really close for 2 years ahead of launch. The 1.2TF was obviously a misunderstanding and was meant that the machine was 1.2TF, not the CPU (which is obvious).
Are you just ignoring how the Sony PS4 info was total bullshit?