Michellstar
Regular
Reveal can´t come soon enough...
They will have to hurry up if February is still on. Next 10 days should invitations leak...Reveal can´t come soon enough...
That wouldn't be impossible if it wasn't Bethesda.maybe this isn't too impossible after all.
On the other hand AMD doesn’t announce PS5 using HW RT. It’s a sign that SONY uses other solution such as POWER VR.
OsirisBlack over at NeoGaf seemed to suggest this is a controlled leak.Cause people who work at development places are prone to use 4Chan ? Or is that from 8Chan ?
OsirisBlack said:He wont get fired, a lot of shit is being dropped purposely.
Had to check with my other source because its kind of easy to pinpoint who he is.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was one of his sources. Obviously he's been wrong before so take with a grain of salt.OsirisBlack said:The specs guy is a system and game engine designer that works for a company. He used to regularly post here and was run off.
It's reasonable enough to explore. Cerny said they have hardware accelerated ray tracing. The github leak did not indicate they have it.How realistic is that? Such "other" 3rd party IP solution would need to share memory bandwidth with the CPU/GPU or would require its own large high speed cache on chip. As I don't know how the GPU cache structure actually works both of these approaches might require a lot cache flush coherency transactions.
I only expect some AMD internal solution to be fully integrated in the GPU's own cache infrastructure.
You mean, like the "Github Leak" which has reached a level of obsession that borders on jihad? Where 9.2TFLPs or 36CU or 2.0Ghz has been repeated on practically every one of the last 100 pages of this thread as if they were fact? I too don't mind exploring these possibilities but hopefully this is all over soon.
Just imagine for a sec, what if that leak had said 15TF of power? No-one would be offended by it.
But sure there are some people really want PS5 is more powerful than XSX not matter the price, or they think XSX will include some Kinect like thing again(barbeque feature anyone?) so PS5 can be same or cheaper price and more powerful.
Lol, the reason this thread was even created was because rumours of the PS5 being more powerful than Scarlett started appearing. That offended some people so much that they felt the need to contain that discussion away from the main thread for console predictions.Just imagine for a sec, what if that leak had said 15TF of power? No-one would be offended by it.
Just imagine if the XSX was 8.3TF, a 9.2TF PS5 rumor would be howled down as unrealistic fanboy drivel. And yet, 9.2TF would in reality be just as unrealistic then as it is now.Just imagine for a sec, what if that leak had said 15TF of power? No-one would be offended by it.
To be specific it was 18GB DDR6.
Mixing up DDR and GDDR is a classic. I also have problems with 18GB, as that implies 288/384 bit bus, which implies uncommon / non-existent GDDR6 clock speeds. Also so far none-existent GDDR6 density.
Just imagine if the XSX was 8.3TF, a 9.2TF PS5 rumor would be howled down as unrealistic fanboy drivel. And yet, 9.2TF would in reality be just as unrealistic then as it is now.
Well... you could construct the RAM amount with mixed densities of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus (12 chips, non-clamshell).
6 x 2GB = 12GB
6 x 1GB = 6 GB
Memory access/bandwidth would be weird for the larger capacity chips. I probably discussed this before for a supposed 320-bit configuration to hit 16GB.
What was the rumoured bandwidth listed? The link seems empty now.
I could probably say during Launch Xbox Executives were making a lot of terrible claims.Can somebody point out the past marketing/PR statements which was so misleading that we can’t help but to continually get into these silly arguments on semantics?
I guess so.18GB DDR6, 576GB/s.
A case of trying to inflating the numbers because bigger = better.
I guess so.
It'd just be 12Gbps GDDR6 on 384-bit bus then. The 12Gbps bin might not be in the catalogue for the 16Gbit chips at Samsung, but that doesn't mean they can't just clock it at that speed (especially since 12Gbps is an option for the 8Gbit bins).
Anyways. 384-bit bus means a larger chip.
That's where the mixed density configuration comes into play (as I tried to convey above) with a 384-bit bus.Also 12gb density chips, which is also not at Samsung.