Rootax
Veteran
The graphic is saying that the RTX 2080 is faster than next gen consoles.What is that supposed to mean? PS5 is going to beat 2080/ti.
What is that supposed to mean? PS5 is going to beat 2080/ti.
Call it all off guys, this is from Jen Hsuang himself at Nvidia conference in China Dec 19
timestamp ~21:15
RTX 2080 Max Q in the Lenovo laptop is 6.5TF. the console mentioned in the picture is Lockhart.
RTX 2080 Max Q in the Lenovo laptop is 6.5TF. the console mentioned in the picture is Lockhart.
The 5700XT is about 20% faster than GTX 1080, that would mean the big Navi is 250% faster than 5700XT, when was the last time we ever saw such huge sudden gains in any tech sector? Talk about logic!The rumour that AMD's next high-end would end up around 2.7x GTX1080 performance has been around for some time - I do believe it's going to be something special given they astonished Samsung enough to the degree that they licensed it.
Talk about pulling stuff straight out of his ass, it's now better than two titans!New This guy is gold
I don't believe that for a second, NVIDIA never cared for any console comparison except the Xbox and PS.Considering how many deals NV is making with the major players in China, it's more likely to be a Chinese console of some sort.
Could be, could also be talking about RT, considering his whole speech was about RTX and RT games.RTX 2080 Max Q in the Lenovo laptop is 6.5TF. the console mentioned in the picture is Lockhart.
When you come from a position of a weak architecture with obvious lackings (Tiling, compression for example) and a history of horrible physical implementations, I don't see it as unjustifiable. 5700XT is running at very inefficient frequencies in the power curve, running 80CUs slower along with µarch and physical improvements doesn't sound outlandish to get you near 250%.that would mean the big Navi is 250% faster than 5700XT, when was the last time we ever saw such huge sudden gains in any tech sector? Talk about logic!
No, that sounds exactly outlandish, we NEVER had this sort of scaling in the entire history of dGPU market, even the mighty 8800GTX barely exceeded the 150% mark (vs older generations) in select situations. What you are talking about here is a monumental leap in efficiency, transistor manufacturing and design, one which should've at least trickled down to small Navi and it's brothers, instead we have 7nm Navi barely competing with 12nm Turing.When you come from a position of a weak architecture with obvious lackings (Tiling, compression for example) and a history of horrible physical implementations, I don't see it as unjustifiable. 5700XT is running at very inefficient frequencies in the power curve, running 80CUs slower along with µarch and physical improvements doesn't sound outlandish to get you near 250%.
We should be pretty happy with 8 zen cores and a 2080 gpu for next gen.
Mobile is not dGPU, it's constrained by power, memory bandwidth, and by years of sub optimal old archs, it's easy to achieve great scaling numbers on new nodes because of that.The dGPU market isn't where the design innovation is coming from, the mobile vendors are the leading edge silicon designers because of competitive necessity
Zen never had a 250% moment vs it's previous generation.Zen most famously somewhat caught up to design features that were ubiquitous in mobile since 7-8 years,
Apple barely had a 200% lead over it's previous gen on a new "node"Look at the absurdity of what Apple is doing right now in mobile