Yes, please!Can we send a team of expert drillers to nuke the core to jumpstart it?
Again!?BTW SpaceX seems to have had a catastrophic failure of their capsule while testing the rockets.
I didn't know them.Rocketlabs had a scrubbed launch today, gonna try again tomorrow.
Rocketlabs is the company that makes Electron.I didn't know them.
https://www.space.com/blue-origin-blue-moon-lander-explained.htmlBlue Moon: Here's How Blue Origin's New Lunar Lander Works
By Hanneke Weitering 10 hours ago News
Blue Origin is shooting for the moon. Here's how.
WASHINGTON — Yesterday, Blue Origin's billionaire founder, Jeff Bezos, revealed the company's plans to land a spacecraft named "Blue Moon" on the lunar surface.
During an exclusive presentation here at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center yesterday (May 9), Bezos laid out the details of Blue Moon and all the ways it can be used to explore Earth's natural satellite.
From new tech to possible crewed missions to the lunar surface, there's a lot to unpack from Bezos' presentation. We'll explain what Blue Origin plans to do with Blue Moon, as well as detail the spacecraft's design and some of its bells and whistles.
https://futurism.com/test-emdrive-breaks-laws-physicsNew Experiment Will Test EmDrive That Breaks the Laws of Physics
If it works, we might one day be able to propel spacecraft without the need for any fuel.
Kristin Houser 7 hours ago
Dream Machine
For nearly 20 years, scientists have debated the viability of an EmDrive, a hypothetical type of engine that could propel a spacecraft without the need for any fuel.
If that sounds too good to be true, that’s because it probably is — a working EmDrive would literally break one of the foundational laws of physics — but that hasn’t stopped scientists from top research organizations including NASA and DARPA from pursuing the tech, because the payoff would be so extraordinary.
Now, a team of German physicists is conducting a new EmDrive experiment — and this one could end the debate surrounding the controversial concept once and for all.
IIRC, the last "big" experiment found out that heat made copper expand a bit and that may explain the "thrust".Of course it can not be completely "debunked" as people are always trying to make more experiments. It's not a bad thing though, as it'd be very useful if such thing is actually possible (and opens up a huge possibility of discovery of new laws of physics). However, based on the results of previous experiments, it's very likely that the so called "EmDrive" is not a real effect, but a combined effects from its surrounding environments.
Really? the EM drive seems more realistic to me
EM drive = creating a tiny amount of thrust
SWarpDynamics = warping spacetime
weve measured examples of spacetime being warped it took the collision of two neutron stars to do it
Various attempts at testing the EM drive did claim certain measured results, but with significant caveats like odd choices in setup, measurements at power-up or non-steady state thermals, measured thrusts in directions other than where they were supposed to be, thrust amounts not consistent with their supposed mechanism at or near the noise floor, and difficulty isolating from equally minor factors like wiring interacting with the Earth's magnetic field.Really? the EM drive seems more realistic to me
EM drive = creating a tiny amount of thrust
SWarpDynamics = warping spacetime
weve measured examples of spacetime being warped it took the collision of two neutron stars to do it
Well, I'm not an expert, but if some of you are more knowledgeable with this stuff, I would like you to visit their Facebook page and website: https://www.spacewarpdynamicsllc.com/Really? the EM drive seems more realistic to me
EM drive = creating a tiny amount of thrust
SWarpDynamics = warping spacetime
weve measured examples of spacetime being warped it took the collision of two neutron stars to do it