My monitor can't be calibrated in HDR mode. All the settings are disabled unless it's in SDR mode.

If I compare it to my secondary SDR monitor (or with itself in SDR mode) the colors do look different, but I have no idea which is more correct.

Yah, on monitors it's very uncommon to have good control. At best you get a hardware calibration option that stores a 3d lut. You never really have extensive manual controls to do a tv-style calibration. I expect monitors limit that control because they don't have the same image processing capabilities to reduce cost and reduce latency.

For my display, which is just HDR, I'm using an open source tool to do my display calibration for me through an undocumented API in the nvidia drivers. I have no idea why things are this dumb.
 
This is gonna be mostly a rant about LG 34GS95QE-B.

FYI I already have a 144Hz 34" ultrawide with a G-Sync module and accustomed to VRR and UW goodness. I'm quite disappointed that moving to the latest-gen MLA+ 240Hz WOLED felt like a downgrade :( Apart from the deeper blacks, it didn’t impress me. Yes, deep blacks are great, but It doesn’t mean much if the color accuracy is worse—so much worse that it can’t even produce proper yellows, instead displaying a mustard-orange like fake yellow. I read this is inherited to all WOLED panels due to using white LED for brightness. Colors feel washed out, and adjusting the vibrancy settings doesn’t help. I used all ICC profiles you can find online and settings (Rtings, Techless and some other YT profiles).

If you plan to use it for work as well, text clarity is bad. You can still save some clarity with clear type settings and higher scaling but still clear type doesn't work on everywhere. Text might be fine at 200% scaling on a 27/32" 4K WOLED screen, but not on a 1440p ultrawide WOLED.

The rest of the annoyances aren’t inherent to OLED itself but rather to my LG screen. HDR is bad due to the vignette like effect due to uncontrollable dimming on the edges. It goes so worse that reds become brown, greens to black, as the screen dimms on the edges to keep up with the brightness level it can produce. It works mostly in dark games like Dead Space but fails in brighter ones like Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2. While the monitor has a nice swivel, aggressive 800R curve still felt too much for me—1500-1600R is more comfortable. The extreme curve also makes screen glare somewhat worse, reflecting light from left to right and concentrating it in the middle with more intensity.

On top of that, LG’s OLED matte coating is very grainy, almost like a film grain effect. Mostly you won't notice but, you can notice it in the skies in games or on white-background text. My trusty curved LG IPS screen’s matte coating didn’t have this issue. Hard to believe they’ve regressed so much in six years.

Some good things; stand is great and takes little desk space, wish more screens were like this. The stand holds the screen firmly and no shakes. Hexagonal back lights might be dim for others but I liked it as it is. It can be helpful against eyestrain if the screen is the only light source in your room. OSD menu and joystick is usual LG goodness and easy to figure out. Blacks are really black. Response time is superb. Difference between 144Hz to 240Hz is noticable. But no DLDSR at 240Hz with DSC. You need to use 144Hz without DSC to be able to use DLDSR. Overall build quality is alright. It has a mouse bungee for even left hand people. SDR content is fine, no brightness dimming on the edges. But if I'm gonna pay a lot I'd at least expect HDR content work well. OLED burn in mitigation features are handy and very useful. It does work automagically without breaking your routine. As soon as display goes to standby or have static content for some time it starts refreshing the pixels.

Needless to say, I returned the monitor, because apparently washed out colored WOLED screens are not for me. I will stick with my ultrawide IPS screen a little longer—maybe I'll pull the plug and order a 240Hz UW QD-OLED or wait until next year's UW QD-OLEDs with updated pixel layout and/or no magenta-purple like blacks when a light source shines on them.
sry to hear that, the Rtings review of that monitor is really really good.

If you are looking for another display, I'd wholeheartedly recommend you to get a 360Hz, 480Hz or more, one, in the future.

I can set my monitor's max refresh rate to 240Hz and it's ok, but 360Hz is really something else. There is a little but important difference, in motion clarity and smoothness.

There are great options like @Rys 's display, which has the best of everything.

That being said, I follow a youtuber which says he'd never get an OLED sreen that isn't QD-OLED since the other technologies have a matte display that affects the image according to him.
 
After returning the LG 34GS95QE-B, I got an MSI 341CQPX. Apart from the stand (which takes up more desk space) and cable management (LG isn’t miles better, but this monitor is slightly worse), I find the main screen properties to be better than the LG. The things I don't like or nitpick are minor and probably a non-issue for others.
  • The colors are superb in both SDR and HDR—better than my old IPS. I can finally see proper yellows instead of mustard/orange that were on the LG 34GS95QE-B, lol.
  • This is my first semi-glossy monitor, and I was initially skeptical due to my desk and window placement. Despite having windows directly in front of the screen, the glare isn’t worse; in fact, I’d say it’s even better than my old matte IPS screen, which would smudge light reflections over a wider area. No MLA-induced oily/dirty effect either.
  • The raised blacks issue is overblown—you’d probably need a studio light, flash light shining directly and in close distance on the screen to notice the magenta tint.
  • The 1800R curvature feels comfortable at 34", whereas 800R was too aggressive (maybe more suitable for 39"/45" screens). My old 34" IPS was 3800R, almost flat.
  • ABL isn’t as aggressive on practise as on the 34GS95QE-B, which caused a vignette effect where ABL kicked in much more aggressively at the edges than in the middle—once you saw it, you couldn’t unsee it. This monitor, on the other hand, has universal brightness dimming, which is harder to notice. I tried RTX HDR on Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 and Avowed, and it looked fine. I can enjoy HDR finally.
  • As for text clarity, maybe it’s my worsening eyesight or viewing distance, but it looks totally fine to me. I use Windows scaling at 100%, and it’s miles better than a 34" 1440p RWBG WOLED. Spreadsheets, Outlook looks nice.
  • Regarding OLED care settings It has almost everything, one thing I miss from the LG is that whenever the screen went into standby, it would start a light pixel refresh, which could be interrupted without causing harm to the panel and a one big pixel refresh you can use manually that you shouldn't interrupt. This monitor doesn’t have that feature. Instead, you can set "Panel Protect" to 16 hours, and once your screen enters standby after 16 hours of usage, it will start a panel refresh. However, while this process can be interrupted, it’s not a good practise. Panel protect takes about 9 minutes.
  • A minor QoL issue: I use a power strip with main and follow sockets—when the main socket turns off, a relay inside cuts power to the follow sockets, saving me from vampire power consumption. This setup automated turning off my speakers and other peripherals, including the monitor. However, since this completely cuts power to the screen, I can't use the panel protect feature during standby. Now, I’ll have to replace the power strip and manually turn off my speakers when I’m not using the PC. Alternatively, I can manually trigger the panel refresh once in a while and wait 10 minutes for it to complete. Desicions, decisions. So far I'm doing manually, maybe bacause I'm lazy to change the power strip.
  • The power supply is built into the monitor, so there’s no external power brick. However, during black screen transitions (e.g., during panel protection), I’ve noticed some faint coil whine-like sounds. That said, I haven’t heard this noise during normal operation or standby. If the power supply was out of the unit, I might not notice the noise.
  • The SDR > HDR and HDR > SDR mode transition takes much longer on the MSI than on the LG. On the LG, it took just a few seconds, whereas on the MSI, it takes easily twice as long.
  • Without DSC, MSI supports refresh rates of 165Hz > 120Hz > 100Hz, while LG supports 144Hz > 120Hz > 100Hz. With DSC enabled, both monitors can run at 240Hz.
 
I watched Monitors Unboxed newest video this morning of an MSI QD-OLED and I had to laugh at the motion clarity section of the review.

IMG_20250322_210627.jpg

So I ran the same blur test on my CRT at 60hz and took a rather terrible offscreen shot with my mobile phone, which doesn't do it justice at showing just how clear the motion is in person, it is arguably clearer at 60hz than this QD-OLED is at 360hz.

IMG_20250322_210318.jpg

Chasing high refresh rates is not the answer, not only is it useless for modern games as you'll never get the frame rate high enough to get the motion clarity you want, but it requires maximum power draw and heat from your complements to run at those frame rates.

Meanwhile my humble CRT is cruising at 60hz....and it goes to 85hz 👀
 
Do you know what camera exposure they’re using? Hard to believe 360Hz looks that bad. CRT phosphor persistence should also add some blur but your image looks super crisp.
 
Do you know what camera exposure they’re using? Hard to believe 360Hz looks that bad. CRT phosphor persistence should also add some blur but your image looks super crisp.

Not all CRT's are equal when it comes to phosphor persistence.

I've had CRT monitors that were considered somewhat 'premium' have noticeable persistence that a 'budget' CRT didn't display.

You also have to factor in screen coating, CRT's are glass so are really, really sharp and crisp compared to modern dispalys.
 
Back
Top