Bondrewd
Veteran
No, the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" is definetly bigger than Intel's semi-custom design.Seems like VEGA12 == "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" == Kaby G GPU
No, the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" is definetly bigger than Intel's semi-custom design.Seems like VEGA12 == "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" == Kaby G GPU
Well, I have the slide in PDF format, and the image of the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" isn't a photo, it's not even a 3D render, it's just a simple 2D image consisting of 5 or 6 colors. Hard to say if the dimensions correspond to the real product.No, the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" is definetly bigger than Intel's semi-custom design.
Well, I have the slide in PDF format, and the image of the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" isn't a photo, it's not even a 3D render, it's just a simple 2D image consisting of 5 or 6 colors. Hard to say if the dimensions correspond to the real product.
Anyway, using HBM2 dimensions as reference (7.75 mm × 11.87 mm), the "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" seems to measure 17.54 × 13.76 = 241 mm² (almost exact half of Vega 10 - 484 mm²). I used the same method for the "Intel Vega" and the result was 16.61 × 13.14 mm, so about 218 mm². Btw. Polaris 10 was 238 mm².
That’s true, but shortly after Kaby Lake-G was originally announced I estimated the die size of its GPU to be ~ 205–222 mm^2 from a photo.I don't think you can determine die size from artistic renderings of the real deal.
What I don't understand is why videocardz screws up the quality on their "leaks". That's straight from AMD's official CES-slide decks which are way better quality than that.Seems like VEGA12 == "Ultrathin Vega Mobile" == Kaby G GPU
Via Videocardz.
Vega Mobile dGPU?So looks like 2018 will be devoid of any new GPU from AMD
Vega Mobile dGPU?
They make boatloat of dosh by selling 1050/1050ti/1060 everywhere, from DT to laptops.Doesn't compete in performance or ultra-high end discrete GPUs which is where Nvidia rules and makes boat load of profits.
They make boatloat of dosh by selling 1050/1050ti/1060 everywhere, from DT to laptops.
1070 sells decently, everything other than that is beyond niche.
As usual, NVIDIA’s gaming segment provides the lion’s share – around 59% – of the company’s Q3 revenue, riding on PC gaming. Up 25% year-over-year, gaming revenue was reported at $1.561 billion, a figure not to be taken lightly: NVIDIA’s Q3 2018 gaming segment alone earned around 95% of AMD’s total revenue of their positive Q3 2017.
...
Officially, NVIDIA attributes the gaming revenue growth to continued sales of Pascal based gaming GPUs.
Does anyone have a sales breakdown per quarter for 1000 series?Nvidia makes a great amount of profit from the 1070 through the Titan.
https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1947417/Nvidia doesn't make boatload of profits from performance and high-end GPU's but you are wrong on both counts. Nvidia makes a great amount of profit from the 1070 through the Titan.
So Vega Mobile is 1.7mm high. Same as Intel's variant of Vega. So, EMIB's "height advantage" seems to have disappeared.
I do too and I agree, but I'm STILL a bit miffed about the way they handled Raja.I like Lisa Su. Seems to me, looking from outside, she has been real good for AMD. She's an engineer (a doctor engineer even ) and has worked hands-on in the industry for years, so she understands the challenges better than someone who is just an executive suit with a business degree. She's been quite ferocious in her enthusiasm for the company even in its darkest days when the stock wasn't worth shit or the talk was they would just go belly up or get bought out by someone, and now that's starting to pay off, even though the graphics division is obviously still suffering from having been (perhaps necessarily) resource starved for so long.
2018 will be an interesting year, it seems.