I didn't expect the GI behind to stop working, because they have a setting specifically for GI quality. So maybe the SSGI is linked with the reflections, if you turn one off the other one goes off too.
Quantum Break [UWP]
- Thread starter Clukos
- Start date
I didn't expect the GI behind to stop working, because they have a setting specifically for GI quality. So maybe the SSGI is linked with the reflections, if you turn one off the other one goes off too.
I noticed GI was off when you turned reflections off. Just didn't think it was weird. Intuitively it makes sense. Not up to date on how reflections are normally done.
AO off: http://abload.de/img/ao_offaish1.jpg
AO on: http://abload.de/img/ao_on4vsk3.jpg
Volumetrics @ medium: http://abload.de/img/v_mediumq9s8r.jpg
Volumetrics @ high: http://abload.de/img/v_highkts5r.jpg
Volumetrics @ ultra: http://abload.de/img/v_ultratkscx.jpg
Some VFX:
http://abload.de/img/11w3ssr.jpg
Like i said previously, despite the game looking a bit blurry i like the overall IQ. VFX are seriously some of the best I've seen in any game, period. Live action episodes (i've seen the first so far) are ok, need to see more before judging.
AO on: http://abload.de/img/ao_on4vsk3.jpg
Volumetrics @ medium: http://abload.de/img/v_mediumq9s8r.jpg
Volumetrics @ high: http://abload.de/img/v_highkts5r.jpg
Volumetrics @ ultra: http://abload.de/img/v_ultratkscx.jpg
Some VFX:
http://abload.de/img/11w3ssr.jpg
Like i said previously, despite the game looking a bit blurry i like the overall IQ. VFX are seriously some of the best I've seen in any game, period. Live action episodes (i've seen the first so far) are ok, need to see more before judging.
I may have to stop playing even if i'm enjoying the game. Performance is embarrassingly bad on my end, easily the worst performing game I've played on this system (way worse than Arkham Knight):
Oh and this is the last UWP game i'm buying, this platform is dead to me.
- Inconsistent frame pacing hurting the moment to moment gameplay
- Random framedrops during non visually taxing sequences
- Crazy input lag due to frame pacing + framerate problems + forced vsync due to UWP
- I think the game suffers from vram leaks as well (performance goes to shit the more you keep playing, is fine after restart)
Oh and this is the last UWP game i'm buying, this platform is dead to me.
Jawed
Legend
Apparently your card is simply too slow to play at even 30fps at maximum settings, so turn down the graphics and turn on the 30fps frame rate cap.
980Ti in gameplay seems faster than Fury X:
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/quantum_break_pc_performance_review/8
I wonder if 4GB is too little memory, judging by the results at 1440 and 2160p
980Ti in gameplay seems faster than Fury X:
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/quantum_break_pc_performance_review/8
I wonder if 4GB is too little memory, judging by the results at 1440 and 2160p
Last edited:
Unfortunately, i'm already running below maxed settings (volumetric lighting to medium and shadows high and most other settings at high) and even if i turn on the 30 fps cap frame pacing is still very bad and it's only worse because the framerate is capped. With the 30 fps cap the game is literally unplayable right now.
Do you have experience with this port? Because telling from your tone i don't think you do. I can turning everything to low and the game looks like a ps2 game, frame pacing is still inconsistent. A 4 tflop GPU isn't good enough to run QB at 1080p? BS.
Different parts of the game stress the engine differently, the article you posted doesn't even state from what part of the game the benchmarks were. I've played parts where the game can run "fine" and parts of the game where it runs worse than anything i've played on PC. It's definitely a problem with the game/UWP/engine and not my system. And that "I've read an article i know better than you" attitude needs to go, I wouldn't be posting about problems here without trying to troubleshoot them first myself. It'd be easier to showcase what the problem is exactly if UWP worked with shadowplay, or any overlay at least...
Last edited:
It's still using the same aa from X1 but at least at 60 fps the IQ in motion should be better (in theory). But to be honest i'm not that annoyed by that, performance is a bigger issue imo. The game is seriously unoptimized in its current state on PC.
DF analysis
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=200461650&postcount=2
Last edited:
Jawed
Legend
You haven't troubleshooted. You turned down some settings slightly and continued to whine.
you and your agenda...
And you've read an article and make claims as to how the game runs, on hardware you don't own, on a game you haven't played yet. Not sure how that's any better. I have a reason to complain (paid money to play a game, i don't complain about the lack of quality differences between the versions, just performance, which greatly affects my enjoyment), you have no reason to defend that mess of a port, or do you?
I've told you what happens, higher %perf as many buffers run at lower res but the issue still remains, something the article doesn't even touch on, frame pacing is all over the place. Of course, you know what that means, judder and inconsistent input latency leading to a mediocre experience no matter the framerate the game is running at. Couldn't care less about avg/min/max framerate. If the problem is UWP, so be it, something is wrong with this port of the game (which i really like from what I've played).
Jawed
Legend
The article I linked earlier shows that 99.9% of frames are at 30fps on GTX960. The data is saying "stutter free".
According to this PC Perspective article on PresentMon (which is used in the overclock3d.net article):
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/PresentMon-Frame-Time-Performance-Data-DX12-UWP-Games
the PresentMon technique is arguably optimistic with frame times, but it indicates stutter in the same situation that FCAT shows no stutter. So PresentMon is pessimistic with respect to stutter. Even when PresentMon says you have stutter you may not experience it.
According to this PC Perspective article on PresentMon (which is used in the overclock3d.net article):
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/PresentMon-Frame-Time-Performance-Data-DX12-UWP-Games
the PresentMon technique is arguably optimistic with frame times, but it indicates stutter in the same situation that FCAT shows no stutter. So PresentMon is pessimistic with respect to stutter. Even when PresentMon says you have stutter you may not experience it.
Similar threads
