Windows Unprotected 'Survival Time' is Now 40 Minutes

According to the latest data at the SANS Internet Storm Center, the average time it takes for an unprotected PC running Microsoft Windows (i.e., firewall off and missing critical security patches) to be compromised after being plugged into the Internet has more than doubled since September 2004. Trouble is, that time gap still isn't that large: An unguarded Windows computer can expect to be hacked within little more than 40 minutes of going online.

The "survival time" of Windows PCs has been steadily on the rise since last fall, when Microsoft released Service Pack 2, a comprehensive security upgrade for Windows XP that made it easier for users to take advantage of the operating system's built-in firewall, as well as automate the installation of security patches.

While Service Pack 2's deployment may explain the survival time in part, the data may also reflect another trend, according to Chicago-based security services firm LURHQ. In the latest edition of the company's "On the Radar" newletter, LURHQ analysts point to the "the lack of any new critical network-based vulnerabilities in Windows workstations since the LSASS exploit."

LURHQ is referring to a security flaw for which Microsoft released a patch in the spring of 2004. The flaw was quickly seized upon by hackers to launch the highly successful "Sasser" worm; since then, the LSASS flaw has become the de facto method for infecting Windows computers through automated attacks, which are typically designed to turn infected PCs into "bots" -- machines that give attackers the power to control an infected computer and link it to networks of "zombie" machines that they can control for a variety of nefarious activities.

While the LURHQ advisory notes that the pool of vulnerable Windows machines is slowly shrinking in the short run, it also stresses that hackers are increasingly finding other ways to hijack Windows PCs and convert them into bots, such as through instant messaging attacks and flaws in Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser.

All of which should serve as yet another reminder of how important it is for Windows users to take basic, preventative measures to stay safe online. If you need help with the basics, like choosing and installing a firewall, anti-virus software, and Windows updates, have a look at our video guides for securing your computer.

News Source@ Washington Post
 
Genuine Windows XP Pro Standard Install (no SP, windows firewall on...) connected to the internet, survival time, in my experience : < 10 minutes.

Need to have a reliable computer in front for it to update. (like BeOS or some well setup linux/bsd...)
Otherwise it'll die before having time to update anything.
 
Last time I tried installing XP SP2 with open internet connection, it took less than 5 minutes to get infected with whatnot.
 
_xxx_ said:
Last time I tried installing XP SP2 with open internet connection, it took less than 5 minutes to get infected with whatnot.

I totally agree with it, I had at least 4 instances of this happening to various friends of mine over last 6 months. 5 min without protection is more than enough to get infected.
 
I can't wait for Longhorn :LOL:

I wonder how they will release Longhorn and if the current exploits are still existent (Hopefully not...but this IS Microsoft where talking bout)....I hate Service Packs...I wish they could streamline them like Gentoo or Fedora Core 3...or Slackware...and be able to choose the updates that I want.
 
BlueTsunami said:
I can't wait for Longhorn :LOL:

I wonder how they will release Longhorn and if the current exploits are still existent (Hopefully not...but this IS Microsoft where talking bout)....I hate Service Packs...I wish they could streamline them like Gentoo or Fedora Core 3...or Slackware...and be able to choose the updates that I want.

yeah, Longhorn will be real change, they already dropped so many features from it that it will more like XP SP3 with fancy GUI then anything else.... :rolleyes:
 
silence said:
BlueTsunami said:
I can't wait for Longhorn :LOL:

I wonder how they will release Longhorn and if the current exploits are still existent (Hopefully not...but this IS Microsoft where talking bout)....I hate Service Packs...I wish they could streamline them like Gentoo or Fedora Core 3...or Slackware...and be able to choose the updates that I want.

yeah, Longhorn will be real change, they already dropped so many features from it that it will more like XP SP3 with fancy GUI then anything else.... :rolleyes:

Isn't there supposed to be some funky 3D desktop being implemented in Longhorn...I remember the Sun Solaris? video that showed different apps in their OS being able to be manipulated in a 3D environment....and I remember hearing Longhorn having something like that...
 
BlueTsunami said:
Isn't there supposed to be some funky 3D desktop being implemented in Longhorn...I remember the Sun Solaris? video that showed different apps in their OS being able to be manipulated in a 3D environment....and I remember hearing Longhorn having something like that...

Yes. Basically, it will look better, consume more resources and enable 3D directly on the desktop. And it will have very good DRM. That's about it.
 
Hmm, I guess my router must provide enough protection because none of my PCs ever get infected, even without a firewall.
And back in the day I used to plug my modem directly into my PC to play games and never got infected.
 
it may looks cool but I fail to see how it's useful, and it may be less usable than a 2D desktop.

I already don't enable moving/fading menus, animations when minimizing etc. as I think they are useless, slow me down and make the UI more bloated. Add in yellow dogs, useless left side panel in explorer.exe, fat double column start menu and fat blue window borders, and you get the windows XP default UI which I can't stand. Longhorn will add a fat vertical toolbar to that.. and 3D on top of that?

all these things get in your way IMO. What about something useful, like drag'n'drop in the taskbar, or enhancing the GUI usability somehow (maybe make use of that third mouse button)
 
Blazkowicz_ said:
it may looks cool but I fail to see how it's useful, and it may be less usable than a 2D desktop.

I already don't enable moving/fading menus, animations when minimizing etc. as I think they are useless, slow me down and make the UI more bloated. Add in yellow dogs, useless left side panel in explorer.exe, fat double column start menu and fat blue window borders, and you get the windows XP default UI which I can't stand. Longhorn will add a fat vertical toolbar to that.. and 3D on top of that?

all these things get in your way IMO. What about something useful, like drag'n'drop in the taskbar, or enhancing the GUI usability somehow (maybe make use of that third mouse button)

Thats why I love KDE. Multiple Virtual Desktops, Floating Taskbar, and you can lock certain Virtual Desktops from being viewed....Linux is wonderful...I just hate having to find obscure libraries just so I can intall Trilian :LOL: .....

The best thing of all is being able to fully go command line. Your apps can still start up as normal...just through command...no GUI...no Graphical annoyances...just you and your #> or $> ...I like GUIs though....when I look at a Full command line setup (no GUI, the OS just starts up to command..which I would do just to mess around)...I relive my training of Sun Spark Solaris System Administration training....ugh....ARRRRRGHHHHH :devilish:
 
Erm, you guys remember that current 2d windoze GUI is fundamentally software rendered?
Remember the difference between software rendered 3d & hardware accelerated 3d?
3D GUI with all the fancy stuff should be faster & generally fundamentally better than software 2d with the fancy stuff off.

Shame about Trusted (by the CIA & RIAA) Computing making Longhorn rather unpalatable though o_O
 
Ho hum just get a hold of nLite, tweak the snot out of your XP install, get the RyanVM hotfix pack...and voila you have all your hotfixes post SP2 till current, slipstream SP2 and Bob's your uncle. Hell you can even integrate your drivers in and applications and make it a completely unattended install. My OEM Xp cd was 550 mb and after I got done with it it ended up @ 150 mb...my Windows folder weighs in around 832 mb on disk...startup with around 23 processes @ 110 - 120 mb of mem usage. Very fast and best of all no crud like Outlook express, Windows Movie Maker, Wordpad, gosh countless drivers and other bloatware. No chance of getting infected while trying to update.
 
Back
Top