Remove some comments, yet things like this remain? "Nice" editing.
If Sony launches the PS4 a year earlier than the competition, at $249 or at most $299, with a machine which is similar to the PS3 so developers can carry over their expertise, they have all the chance in the world to pull a PS2 again...
I think Sony did a very good job of living up to their reputation this gen...
umm...
Sony used to have a reputation. This gen, they've done everything possible to piss it away.
I dont think it's just Sony's fault/actions
Correct, MS and N have done a very good job filling the void Sony left for them.
But make no mistake, this gen was Sony's for the taking. They just got too greedy.
umm...
Sony used to have a reputation. This gen, they've done everything possible to piss it away.
I am talking about Sony as a company....not just the playstation brand.... although, even the PS2 was a *different* type of hardware to develop for..........
To greedy? ... that's making a mistake.
Oh no doubt, I'm saying they got too greedy by trying to tie BR to ps3 and have gamers foot the bill without any tangible gaming benefit over their competition to justify the increased cost.
I almost sure ms would have used hddvd if it was ready.They launched early only for a head start, and said HDMI and 1080p doesnt matter, now look they use HDMI and 1080p logos
1) The comments removed were off-topic talk about whether games were good or not, with 'not the most civil' of language, that would have taken the thread in the wrong direction. I nipped it in the bud. If the debate was civil and well handled, I'd have reminded people to stay on target and/or spawned it into another thread.Remove some comments, yet things like this remain? "Nice" editing.
1) The comments removed were off-topic talk about whether games were good or not, with 'not the most civil' of language, that would have taken the thread in the wrong direction. I nipped it in the bud. If the debate was civil and well handled, I'd have reminded people to stay on target and/or spawned it into another thread.
2) Do you think mods don't sleep? Or have no other life than monitoring the board? You expect us to react within moments 24/7 to any board 'infraction'?
3) What's wrong with waving GT around as a reason Sony aren't out of the running? You'll have to explain your complaint better.
4) Any complaints of posts should be reported with the 'Report Post' button, and any complaints of the moderation should be posted in the Forum Feedback forum or via PM to the mod.
I'll leave Skyring's post and this here, even though they're messing up the thread, or some will assume any cleaning up done is suppressing his free speech and the mods want him silenced because he's onto us...
As with any game, GT fanboys view the game and its importance in the grand scheme of things through rosy glasses. There were 90+ million PS2 fans last generation who didn't care about GT. GT by itself may make the PS3 the best niche console for racing games, but it can't bring it back to dominance - you need more multi-million sellers for that.
The way I saw it, it was a (tongue-in-cheek) comment that Sony can't be dead because they still have GT5. The picture is also a reaction from Arwin's enthusiasm over that particular part in the demo, which, according to him, has very natural, realistic silk moving around. If you haven't seen Arwin's posts elsewhere, you won't have picked up on this, but he is very, very excited! As a quick response to the OP, it seems okay to me, though if he has more to say, he should expand.To point 3, at what point does merely posting a picture with no commentary constitute a discussion?