VIA / Centaur makes a comeback with all new x86-cores and integrated AI accelerator

Kaotik

Kaotik

Drunk Member
Legend
Supporter
Centaur Technologies, subsidiary of VIA Technologies, has announced new "server class x86 chip with integrated AI-accelerators"
It has 8 all new x86 cores with claimed "high IPC" and AI-accelerator called "NCore" based on 32 768 -bit wide SIMD architecture

https://centtech.com/ai-technology/

More details will be released on December 2nd in "deep dive article" by Microprocessor Report
 
If Walmart is the start of Skynet then we really don't have anything to fear.
 
Some more insight into this chip from WikiChip, this time focusing on the NCORE processor:

https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/3256/centaur-new-x86-server-processor-packs-an-ai-punch/

Some nice die shots in there. The full wikichip article is up too:

https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/centaur/microarchitectures/cha#CNS_Core_2

What's interesting to me is the die size for this chip - its apparently 194mm2 and 34mm2 of that is for the NCORE.

Compare that to 1st gen ZEN which is 212mm2, which has half as many memory channels and nearly half as many pcie lanes.
 
Magnum_Force said:
Compare that to 1st gen ZEN which is 212mm2, which has half as many memory channels and nearly half as many pcie lanes.
Click to expand...
The Zen (Summit Ridge) die has 32 PCI-E lanes, but the AM4 socket only connects 24 lanes on the desktop.

It is one of a few aspects that are overbuilt for the desktop, inflating die size, but allowed them to use the same die across desktop, workstation, embedded and server products.
 
Are these the same cores going into the Zhaoxin motherboards that went on sale in the chinese market?
 
So the Zhaoxin CPU is an evolution of the same Centaur cores but without the neural network units?
 
ToTTenTranz said:
So the Zhaoxin CPU is an evolution of the same Centaur cores but without the neural network units?
Click to expand...
The NCORE is separate from the CPU cores, also if they're small evolutionary step it should belong to same Family of CPUs. Though there is some variance in the naming and I have no clue how often CentaurHauls changes families.
For example Intel has everything from P6 to Tiger Lake including Atoms in Family 6, while Netburst in between was different Family. On AMD side Zen/Zen+/Zen2 are Family 17 (Except for the chinese Hygon Dhyana which was Family 18), but Zen 3 will be Family 19, Bulldozer-based were one family, while Cat-cores were 2 families split to Bobcat and Jaguar/Puma.
 
Kaotik said:
The NCORE is separate from the CPU cores, also if they're small evolutionary step it should belong to same Family of CPUs. Though there is some variance in the naming and I have no clue how often CentaurHauls changes families.
For example Intel has everything from P6 to Tiger Lake including Atoms in Family 6, while Netburst in between was different Family. On AMD side Zen/Zen+/Zen2 are Family 17 (Except for the chinese Hygon Dhyana which was Family 18), but Zen 3 will be Family 19, Bulldozer-based were one family, while Cat-cores were 2 families split to Bobcat and Jaguar/Puma.
Click to expand...

Then there isn't really a fixed criteria over what AMD calls a family, at least not one I can identify. The Jaguar is clearly an evolution of Bobcat and they called it a different family.

I used the term evolution mostly because of the timings (one coming right after the other), and assumed VIA doesn't seem to have the manpower to be developing 2 distinct architectures at the same time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
IBM backstabbing sony and neglected Apple ? (long read)
5 6 7
Replies
126
Views
47K
Fox5
F
Back
Top