Parallel Universe(s) question

[Blazkowicz]

I know what infinity is, yes.

I used 'really big number' in an apparently failed attempt to point out the ludicrosity of the idea of new parallel universes created & persisting in real parallel existence per possible state per sub-atomic particle per planck-time in each universe from no energy source.

It is ludicrous, but it seems to me the most probable parallel universes mechanism. It's known as MWI or many worlds interpretation of quantum physics.
Basically, reality branches into two universes, one in which the cat is dead, the other one where the cat is alive.

We'll probably never know if it true or not.
Parallel universes can't ever be reached, we probably won't ever be able to prove or disprove them.

An interpretation I read in some article said that all combinations of our universe exist and at each plank time we switch from one to another (this is an oversimplification as I don't want to think of the mess with relative time).

 

[RudeCurve]

We'll probably never know if it true or not.
Parallel universes can't ever be reached, we probably won't ever be able to prove or disprove them.

You may know when you die.

 

[Richard]

If there are infinite amount of points where Big Bang originated then the chance of these bubbles interacting with each other is high even if they can exist independently from each other. We should see evidence of that. We should be able to witness Big Bang if that is true and often too.

Why? If the domain is infinite how can you statistically represent discrete points, even if there are an infinite number of them. The exception being for a domain(0, a) where the number of points = a of course, but since we don't have a bubble in our solar system it's safe to say n < a.

 

[Prophecy2k]

*mind blown*