Thanks Uttar, where did you get that number from? (If you don't mind me asking)Uttar said:One small number that might interest you guys: AFAIK, this solution is approximatively 35% faster than Alienware's
The reviewer crowd.LeStoffer said:What is their target group with this expensive beast anyway? Show off or actually demand?
trinibwoy said:Why wouldn't you be able to overclock it? As long as you can get the same stable overclock on both cards it should be fine.
thop said:The only good thing about it is that in let's say 2 years when your 6800 isn't fast enough anymore you can just buy a second one. Still i'd prefer to just buy a new card then instead of having 2 monsters in my box but anyway it's sth. you can consider.
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros. said:Such systems in the past have often been very timing critical. Overclocking them enough can screw up the timing, making them slower then when clocked normally. IIRC, this was the often case for Voodoo 2 SLI, V5500/6000 and ATI MAXX. Multiple chip/board solutions have to work very tightly together.
V-Sync: It turns out that the fear that V-Sync would need to be enabled during parallel GPU operation is unfounded. NVIDIA has solved this problem by using a buffer to merge the two cards' signals. The danger of seeing tearing in a scene is therefore no greater than when using a single graphics card with V-sync deactivated. This way, the cards can run at the highest possible frame rate without being limited by the monitor's refresh rate.
Overclocking: Overclocking the card will still be possible through the driver. In this case, both cards will be overclocked to the same level.
trinibwoy said:Well I definitely don't have any understanding of the technical limitations but intuitively it should not be an issue. As long as each card is stable and able to render its workload it should work fine. According to this I may be right.
thop said:The only good thing about it is that in let's say 2 years when your 6800 isn't fast enough
nelg said:IMHO alternate frame rendering is a better solution. Imagine temporal AA on a dual R420.
nelg said:IMHO alternate frame rendering is a better solution. Imagine temporal AA on a dual R420.
Empasis mine, 400 watts for just GPU & CPUs?!?!Extreme Tech said:However, Nvidia's solution requires two PCI Express x16 slots. This is similar in concept to having two AGP slots in a system. Currently, the only known motherboards slated to ship with two PCI Express slots are based on Tumwater chipset, which supports Intel's x86-64 CPU code-named Nocona.
Now, stop and think about that for a moment. The original SLI was something that almost any Voodoo 2 buyer could aspire to. Relatively few people did, mind you, but you always had the comfort of knowing you could do it in your current system.
But if you've got a high end PC, with a PCI Express graphics card, you'll have to upgrade to a pricey motherboard using one or two expensive CPUs on top of plopping down several hundred dollars on a new graphics cards.
Now think of the power requirements. We'll have two GPUs that require around a hundred watts each, plus a couple of CPUs that need a hundred watts each. Hooray, we're up to 400W and we haven't installed memory or hard drives!
The boutique OEMs like Falcon Northwest and Voodoo PC will certainly offer this as an option, but you can be sure that any system that supports two PCI Express x16 cards will not be cheap. Of course, people who buy the system will have terrific bragging rights. "Dude, I got a 3D Mark score of 30,000!"
digitalwanderer said:Empasis mine, 400 watts for just GPU & CPUs?!?!
joe emo said:am I the only one who thinks it's extremely funny that the Geforce6800 is still rarer than an clean prostitute, and NVIDIA is already giving us the option to buy two of them at the same time?
joe emo said:am I the only one who thinks it's extremely funny that the Geforce6800 is still rarer than an clean prostitute, and NVIDIA is already giving us the option to buy two of them at the same time?