With tensor cores, you can only reduce the amount of rays by filling in the gaps.
Infiltrator doesn't use raytracing and it takes advantage of DLSS. It's a super-resolution type of technology, not a denoiser.Everyone is saying that DLSS upsamples a sparse render and therefore increases performance vs rendering the equivalent number of pixels.
Why couldn’t that same tech be used to simply AA an image with no upscaling funny business similar to FXAA?
Epic representatives again repeated the same thing, the demo took 4 Volta GPUs originally, now it took one Turing. There is no conspiracy here. Just more optimizations, DLSS inclusion and RT acceleration on the RT cores.no offence but that whole "one turing card is faster than a single dxg system" is a complete lie
Just in case you are not being sarcastic: That's just a grossly oversimplified illustration to show how different parts of the calculation can overlap. In fact, RT- and Tensor-Cores are integrated into the individual SMs. Even under the assumption that the chip shot is just an equally oversimplified artists interpretation and not resembling reality at all, it would take large amounts of energy to move all that data around for a single frame. The 24 bright spots in the upper and lower horizontal middel for example are most likely the Raster Backends/ROPs.
This clearly shows that the Ray Tracing is using a separate part of the Turing to do the Ray Tracing (Green) and that the Tensor Cores (Purple) are on a different part of the chip.
i learned not to believe anything that nvidia or others affiliated with them say unless i see a poc that fiasco of the 5xxx series was literally the last nail for me when it comes to that companyEpic representatives again repeated the same thing, the demo took 4 Volta GPUs originally, now it took one Turing. There is no conspiracy here. Just more optimizations, DLSS inclusion and RT acceleration on the RT cores.
i learned not to believe anything that nvidia or others affiliated with them say unless i see a poc that fiasco of the 5xxx series was literally the last nail for me when it comes to that company
You're still mad about the ~15 year old FX series?
I think that largely depends on two factors: technological departure and competitive environment. As such, I think G80 presents a good analogue:
- Significant departure from previous architecture
- Very large die size by the day's standards (both were the largest consumer GPUs to date at launch)
- Relative competitive vacuum: launched as clear-cut performance leaders with competition's counterparts many months away.
- While not a simultaneous 3-tier release, the "super high end" part did come within about 6 months into largely intact competitive landscape despite R600 launch
View attachment 2643
I think the biggest mistake is calling $1,000 card "TI", a price point which has historically been reserved for Titan-class cards and, which is is by far the biggest departure form $650-700 price point these cards have historically been at. Should have called it a "Titan" and then released similar-specked "TI" card early next year at $800 price point and raffled a lot less feathers.
Depending on the performance, $1000 may or may not be a fair value 2080 TI but regardless they messed up their own price tier/naming convention for no good reason.
Infiltrator doesn't use raytracing and it takes advantage of DLSS. It's a super-resolution type of technology, not a denoiser.
Editor's day stuff ...
NVIDIA Turing gets a bigger L2 cache ... 2x Pascal cache
https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-upgrades-l1-and-l2-caches-for-turing
Since apparently they don't have it already, or not very high fps, then I'd say it would be a lot easier and cheaper to add in a post process at the end of the chain rather than replace a lot of equipment throughout the chain.On the countrary, it's always better to actually film @ very high fps in the first place. I'd expect media and other professionals to be able to afford that
@vipa899
Those diagrams are already in the thread.
Since apparently they don't have it already, or not very high fps, then I'd say it would be a lot easier and cheaper to add in a post process at the end of the chain rather than replace a lot of equipment throughout the chain.