Ahonen clearly does not understand software platforms and ecosystem importance. He claimed Nokia had much better ecosystem than Apple with Symbian QT in 2011 even when it was clear Apple was dominating and Nokia had no developer mindshare.
You're blatantly wrong and yes, Ahonen is right.
Your first mistake is in the "Symbian QT".
It's not "Symbian QT". It's "Symbian+MeeGo+Windows+Android+Linux" QT.
To even think all these won't surpass the amount of iOS developers even now is simply ridiculous.
At the beginning of 2011 Nokia did have a very large and very strong developer mindshare. The world's largest, by far.
Yes, fragmentation between S60v3, S60v5 and S^3 was (still is..) a total mess, but it still did lots of money to thousands of developers.
You can replay the engadget's/gizmodo's utter lies about Nokia already being in a downward spiral in the Q1 2011.. but it won't make it any truer.
In Q1 2011 sales weres rising, ASP was rising and
profits were hitting records.
Of course if one only goes looking for information from tech-news sites situated in the only country in the world where Nokia didn't have a crystal-clear dominance of both feature and smartphones, where all they do is complain how Nokia handsets fail at copying the iphones (as if they ever tried to do that), then yes, that person will get the exact same opinion as you do.
All the innovation was happening on other platforms. Bizarro world.
What innovation happened in other platforms that didn't happen in Q4 2010 Symbian^3 devices?
Capacitive screens? Check. Touch-friendly interface? Check.
RGB AMOLED screens? Check. Social Integration? Check.
App store? Please.. they had it years before the "app trend".
Carrier billing for app purchases? Even today, only Nokia has that.
A smartphone camera? N8 is pretty much unrivaled even today.
NFC? That's only recently being implemented in Androids, whereas the mid-range C7 launched 2 years ago already had it.
So what exactly is this huge lack of innovation that you mention?
All he takes in to account are hardware features..
This is simply a lie.
Try to actually read any of his blog entries and none of them will mention hardware features exclusively.
Even that accusation is downright ridiculous, as the man is a world-class pioneer in
mobile services.
Basically Tomi is a prime example of the old Nokia management that doomed the company. Except he actually was there...
Tomi was in Nokia during their golden years and left way before the piss-poor hardware/design decisions for the S60v5 models were made.
Again: Nokia's problems were ones of
execution. All models were coming out later than predicted and that could be dangerous on the long run. They just needed to reduce the number of decision layers inside the company and churn out new models faster.
Instead, the BoD decided to destroy the company's value in order to dismantle it and sell it for cheap to Microsoft.