disclaimer: This isn't a gaming thread thus I'm posting under the general forum.
While many already know, for those unaware it was learned that in the BF:BC beta that even unlocking certain guns requires you to pay.
First, let me say that I don't have a problem with DLC such as map packs/new areas in sand box games/tracks/car packs when they are developed after the release of a game and knowingly withheld for the sole purpose of DLC. In this case the motivation from the developer is genuine in that they do want to profit more from the existing game but they're also working for it.
In the case of BF:BC we have a game that is finished and sold to the consumer for $60 a copy. Now you bring that game home and start playing. Then you notice that you can't do X/Y/Z because you have to pay additional for it! No. Not additional content later on but the same copy you have is locked down. To get the "full version" your cost now might be $70? $80?
Since we have a fair amount of users in the industry, what is your opinion of this? Who makes such decisions? EA or DICE? Personally, I cannot support any such action regardless of how amazing a game is. This is just testing the waters. If such actions prove profitable the reigns will only get tighter. I’m not in the market for paying $80+ to finally get the version of a game that was packaged onto the disc.
While many already know, for those unaware it was learned that in the BF:BC beta that even unlocking certain guns requires you to pay.
First, let me say that I don't have a problem with DLC such as map packs/new areas in sand box games/tracks/car packs when they are developed after the release of a game and knowingly withheld for the sole purpose of DLC. In this case the motivation from the developer is genuine in that they do want to profit more from the existing game but they're also working for it.
In the case of BF:BC we have a game that is finished and sold to the consumer for $60 a copy. Now you bring that game home and start playing. Then you notice that you can't do X/Y/Z because you have to pay additional for it! No. Not additional content later on but the same copy you have is locked down. To get the "full version" your cost now might be $70? $80?
Since we have a fair amount of users in the industry, what is your opinion of this? Who makes such decisions? EA or DICE? Personally, I cannot support any such action regardless of how amazing a game is. This is just testing the waters. If such actions prove profitable the reigns will only get tighter. I’m not in the market for paying $80+ to finally get the version of a game that was packaged onto the disc.