In the developers' comments video at the Nintendo Wii conference, he appeared as "Game Creator" while other Square Enix execs appeared with their respective titles at the company.Why ?
In the developers' comments video at the Nintendo Wii conference, he appeared as "Game Creator" while other Square Enix execs appeared with their respective titles at the company.Why ?
i think this game will benefit from the Team Ninja effect. Being one of the few AAA RPG on the system, big fish in a tiny little pond, should make sure it succeeds. Whether it will shift people over from FF, doubtful, but a game of this calibre certainly can't hurt.
.) I'd like to see how this game shapes up. Also, how this game attacks the barrier of DVD9.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6157718.html?tag=latestnews;title;1The game uses a single graphics engine for everything. "The modeling itself is basically the same for the cinematic and real-time sequences. There isn't a lot of difference in texture resolutions or level of detail."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aSoJVYqlqA
This music in this trailer is just awe inspiringly amazing. On par with any FF score I've heard. I had to play it a few times just for the music alone.
I wonder if LO and BD doesn't sell very well (most likely due to there not being many systems sold to begin with) will they still carry on the third one exclusively for the system as well or either jump ship or go multi-platform? such ambitious projects really. possibly some of the biggest on the system.
how many think these games may be time-exclusive? yes, I know MS practically funded the whole project and Mistwalker said they were all exclusives. but the industry seems to delibritly confuse time-exclusivity with 'real' exclusivity. I think IF such a venture would under perform for any reason, the chance of platform jumping is always an option. MistWalker is still an independant developer after all.
just woundering about the business side of things.
The business side of things are like this:
The games are both published by Microsoft.
So unless MS starts publishing games for other systems you can rest assured these will remain 360 exclusive.
Doesn't MS own Mistwalker? Wiki says MS provided financial backing, don't know if that means they own it. Interesting, the Wiki entry also says they outsource coding duties with Mistwalker just handling the design.It's not out of the question for them to use another publisher to release it on other platforms. It has happened before. It depends on what the terms of the initial contract was.
It's very unlikely MS owns the game or the IP.
It's not out of the question for them to use another publisher to release it on other platforms. It has happened before. It depends on what the terms of the initial contract was.
It's very unlikely MS owns the game or the IP.
Actually they did a lot more then just fund development.Rumour has it they directly funded development of both these games
So unless MS starts publishing games for other systems you can rest assured these will remain 360 exclusive.
It's not out of the question for them to use another publisher to release it on other platforms. It has happened before. It depends on what the terms of the initial contract was.
It's very unlikely MS owns the game or the IP.
This quote doesn't say that the game doesn't use any CGI video cutscenes, actually it doesn't clearly say anything, the wording being too vague.Realtime cinematics for this game, not CG
The game uses a single graphics engine for everything. "The modeling itself is basically the same for the cinematic and real-time sequences. There isn't a lot of difference in texture resolutions or level of detail."
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6157718.html?tag=latestnews;title;1