This is what struck me with The Hobbit (which I've seen on a PC), the entire party survives 20 or 50 meter falls and they get attacked by giant dogs all the time. Real giant dogs would have been able to chop limbs off with a single bite and otherwise make a big mess of those dwarves.
.. yea I know I'm complaining about an obvious fantasy film
I felt the original Ring trilogy was a rather respectful adaptation in almost all respects. . . .
There's more action in the movies - naturally! The books are full of lengthy monologues, poetry, verse, song and dialogue in archaic english. As an adaptation, I don't believe you could do all that much better than what Jackson accomplished. He could have skipped making Gimli into a comic relief character (laughing at the dwarf... kind of off-putting really), but most of the rest is what you get if you want to make a movie out of the books and not have it so boring and stilted that basically nobody wants to watch them.Ummm, no. It basically turned Tolkien's books into an action romp for 14-25yo men.
It's rather that warcraft was inspired by art created from the works of Tolkien's stories I would think... The visual designs of the Ring movies was created by two of the foremost Tolkien illustrators, whom have bodies of work spanning literally decades.When seeing them, I immediately thought they were very much inspired by Warcraft III Wargs. The brown shamanic/drudic Gandalf was very much Warcraft III esthetics too, or even the Elven city but maybe such depicting of Elves predated Warcraft.
YOU DIDN'T FINISH THE HOBBIT! What a crime! It's a good book, you should go read it again. Borrow it at a library if you don't want to spend any money on something you might not like (but I see no reason why you shouldn't - like I said, it's a good book. )I did not see the LOTR trilogy btw, same way for the book, I only read The Hobbit as a kid (I didn't finish it).