The obvious question is of course: How do we know that this is a real effect and that the scattering chamber is not simply contaminated with DNA decomposition products?
Well how do you know anything at all? Either you'll experiment and find out for yourself, or you'll search for info, people etc. and try to prove if it has any merrit.
The modern science can't yet explain such basic things like magnetism or gravity or how electricity works, but you never doubted those ideas either. Why? Do you think we should not continue research into those and the "final truth" is settled?
Another totally off the bat question, do you think vacuum is empty and static? The "regular" science says so, while the quantum theory speaks of zero-point energy etc. Which is right, which is wrong? Or are they both wrong or both valid or depending on the situation and the problem observed?
Obviously the workings of DNA will take quite a while to get resolved, but you surely won't believe that a couple of thousands alkali pairs are all the info it takes to contain our whole genetic "blueprint" and all the programming that gets obvious throughout our lives? Surely it's highly unlikely that DNA is just there for protein production (according to more recent research, it's only a tiny part of DNA that does that). So it's all still a huge mistery.
As of right now, our science can't even tell what makes the heart tick or how an emotion works, let alone having the authority to blindly deny such novel new theories with the non-argument "we don't get it, so it's nonsense science" or the good old "it defies the (classical) laws of physics" which are already defied in many areas like the aforementioned quantum theory.
I never had anything to do with this sort of research and don't claim that it's "100% true" or whatever. I'm just open for new possibilities and whatever we can learn from this, it's great that we can learn something new as such. Even if that turns out being the knowledge that this or that does not work as assumed.
I read of one theory that intrigued me, based on some old ideas by Tesla and Moray. From my shaky memory, it says something like that the electrons don't do a 360° rotation around the nuclei, but 2x360° - once in real and once in complex (in math terms) space. The energy they absorb in complex space can be released in the real space as EM-radiation when you create a certain sort of dipole. That was supposedly Tesla's idea for getting free energy, which is supposedly also how the infamous "Moray generator" should work - by harnessing that energy via a apparatus which spposedly can convert that to regular EM-energy.
Then you look back and see that until less than 100 years ago, aether was a valid concept in science until certain groups declared it as impossible (just so, of course). Could it be that the vacuum is actually not empty and stale but full of oscillating cosmic energy, or zero-point energy? Or a chaos of energy vortices in the complex space ("4th dimension") interacting with our space via yet undiscoverd means? I don't know, but I'm not inclined to blindly deny it, based on many observable occurances which can't be explained in terms of regular science. The problem explained:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000398/00/cosconstant.pdf
And although I neither have the knowledge nor the means to check this, it surely sounds interesting and I am open for the possibility that there might be something we could get out of it, be it wrong or right. I'd never dare saying "I'm an expert (electronics engineer) and according to all the science I know, this can't be possible" - in my book that would disqualify me totally. One must also be capable to accept that maybe, just maybe, your thinking was wrong or incomplete and whatever new idea might be better. The good old ego pains (and in case of current science, funding is a big factor too as witnessed with AGW-church-of-doom).
And I was wondering when the messiah will appear...