Interesting Info from COO of ATI

I guess you have tossed out the entire history of Nvidia refresh products eh? Since when does Nvidia make sweping changes to its refresh product? The Nv30 has *Nothing* over the R300 core without its extreme core clock. I dont think the more advanced pixel shaders ammount to a hill of beans in the real scheme of things. While capable of executing more instructions etc... It seems highly unlikely that they will be at playable rates for anything over what Standard DX9 offers. Especially for the next 12-24 months. I am not saying that whatever improvements to the pixel shaders ATi makes is all that important either. However you do seem to have a misplaced belief that the Nv30 is somehow significantly more advanced than the R300...... Realistically what a Nv30 refresh part would do is add another Vertex shader or two, and increase the core clock again.

The R400 is ATi's next Generational jump. Not a half-way refresh. thats the R350. Nvidia will be throwing their Refresh part against ATi's Generation jump.

EDIT:

I keep reading people say that the R350 is just a faster clocked R300 with DDR-II. This is not the pattern of ATI at all. It is the R350 Folks not the R300A. It has significant additions to the R300. Nor is it going to use DDR-II. Just DDR.

 

I think that right now the US market coupled with the Asian market will soak up much of the demand for these cards. You can be sure that the Swedish market isn't as lucrative as a result of the Sweedish governments high tax rates on technology thus making it a lower priority in terms of marketing. High taxes make pricing the card competitively while still maintaining decent margins, difficult.

 

How do you know? ATI's never released a refresh part.

 

Interesting, and the Spring time-line is very much in effect, imho.

 

Wasn't the RV200 (Radeon 7500) a 'refreshed' version of the orginal Radeon Core? Process change, new memory interface and speed bumped. Absolutely a refreshed part if you use Nvidias definition.

 

The RV250 is a refresh of the R200 core as well. But the difference is that the RV250 is the R200 core cut back by some nearly 20 mil transistors, AFAIK it is about a 40 mil transistor part making it a more considerably cheaper chip to produce resulting in an extremely competitive design. But this is an RV part the V supposedly standing for value and the part is ment for the low end market. It is a "refresh" if you like but not a part that has higher performance then the original core. Personally I see it as the new low end bar replacing the MX series cards and quiet an improvement on the lower end of the market as a whole.

 

R400, hopefully it have a "16"pipeline and higher clock GDDRIII.

 

MMMM *cough* that's a bit much isn't it? *cough*

 

My very reliable sources tlel me it will have thea GDDRIII on a nice fat 1024 bit bus, running at 1.6 Ghz for an unprecedented 240GB/s of bandwidth.
Effectve bandwith will have to be measure in TB/s

 

Chalnoth...

All Ati chip designations have differing Architectures to some degree. This can be followed WAY back through their history. Trying to push the idea that the R350 is just a R300 with a faster core is totally silly. a slightly Tweaked faster clocked R300 would not get a 1/2 generation Chip identifier. It would be R300A or R305 or something like that.

While i have no idea what the specific changes and enhancements are, I do know that It offers several New features that are apparently going to shock a lot of people, Its going to include some features that people were not expecting till the next generation.

This information is not that of the Alexsox variety. Just like I have been telling you that the R350 was a real product and would be introduced Q1, likely FEB for several wekks now.

(BTW, in case you did not know i have been a Staff member of Area3D with NitroGL, Bacon, Nathan, and until recently MultiGL for a few months now.... not that my *info* comes from any of them)

 

Basically, you're suggesting an arrangement of 8x2... while i could definetly agree with you there (that does sound reasonable), i'd like to point out that we can no longer refer to TMUS as we always used to... it's no longer just that, whether it's 8x2 or 8x1, that doesn't make much difference anymore, as it's becoming less and less important nowdays...

As a proof to my claim, here is a quote from Digit-Life's GeForce FX article:

 

My hotmail source substantiates your source. 8)

 

How about 0.0000000000000000001*10^(-23) micron tech with 20 GB eDRAM having 100 TBit bus?

sounds nice? yeah. why not drop out the old pipeline design and make MultiScalar 512 Bit accurancy Pixel RayTracer with huge parallerlism capable pushing more than 2 fully 24 Super Sampled anti-aliased tera pixels per second on polar cordinate iMax compliant format?

why not?
- propably MS wouldn't support it.

Cider gets on my head... need something to eat...

 

If you cut out a few things that Nappe1 said you can probably get quite good picture on what R400 might be .

 

I picked up some info yesterday night... in a club (if you were over there you know what I'm talking about ): it seems R350 is just an overclocked R300 with no ddr2.
Dunno but previously I expected ddr2 - well, we'll see...

 

Some real gumboes in there guys....

 

This would be in line with what I have suspected all along--what's the point in making a significant jump in the spring, and then another significant jump in late summer--when you don't have to? Or, as someone else suggested, R350 could be a value part for notebooks (that might or might not fit in with what was said about R350.) I guess I have to concede at this point that we do have some decent evidence that "R350" exists (not that I doubted you, HB, I was just looking for some confirmation from ATI and this would *appear* to be that--except for the nature of the R350, of course.)

But let's say yields have improved and pipelines get tweaked, etc., and you come up with a better cooling solution (not like nv30's--just a lot more efficient than at present)--I don't think 400MHz-425MHz is out of the question for R300. The whole point of the 256-bit bus is to be able to put off the move to DDR II until you have the GPU power to fuel such a bus and you've given the II technology a bit of time to mature. If they stick to DDR but move to 2.2-2.3ns DDR, the combination would significantly enhance current R300 performance (enough to easily steal nv30's thunder--assuming nv30 actually hits 500MHz in quantity), and then save your .13 micron ~500MHz R400 beastie, coupled with your ~40 gig/sec DDRII/256-bit bus for the late-summer/fall release--at which time that product will easily keep up with and probably surpass whatever nVidia might wish to do with its nv30 fall refresh.

But I'm not placing bets... ATI surprised the heck out of me with R300--won't be making glib projections about them again...

 

Username-

Doesnt seem to effect investors much. I'm pretty amazed at their mirror trend with all similar markets... unlike other contenders in this arena..

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=c&...on&z=m&q=l&x=on&y=on&w=on

 

R350 has nothing to do with the mobile segment... that would be the chip under the M10 codename. They may share tech, but they'll be completely different chips.