Hey guys,
the guys at Aces Hardware have come across some very interesting results concerning 3DMark2003. It seems that three of the four gaming tests of this benchmark are so GPU limited that a PII 350 MHz with Radeon 9700 can keep up with a P4 2.8 GHz with a Radeon 9600. However, the PII can't keep up in any of the real world gaming tests.
http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000242
A quote from the conclusion:
Personally I think this is a confirmation that 3DMark2003 is severely overdone as what is supposed to be a gamers benchmark.
the guys at Aces Hardware have come across some very interesting results concerning 3DMark2003. It seems that three of the four gaming tests of this benchmark are so GPU limited that a PII 350 MHz with Radeon 9700 can keep up with a P4 2.8 GHz with a Radeon 9600. However, the PII can't keep up in any of the real world gaming tests.
http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000242
A quote from the conclusion:
For a synthetic graphics accelerator benchmark, this is an ideal situation. But this is not how 3DMark03 has been represented. It is stated to provide an overview of your "system's current gaming performance." Yet from our results, it has failed in that charge twice, by grossly exaggerating the performance of a 350 MHz Pentium II with a Radeon 9700 Pro and minimizing the performance of a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 with a Radeon 9600.
Personally I think this is a confirmation that 3DMark2003 is severely overdone as what is supposed to be a gamers benchmark.