"Smaug" as in the dragon in the hobbits.
http://www.crn.com/sections/hardware/hardware.jhtml?articleId=164301384
http://www.crn.com/sections/hardware/hardware.jhtml?articleId=164301384
bbot said:Someone in the Teamxbox forum made this comment:
"Everyone feared Smaug, but his arrogance and a soft spot on his belly lead to his doom.
He was ended with a single arrow."
xbdestroya said:eventually discredited
Fafalada said:"He was ended with a single arrow."
... but only after he lived for a couple thousand years and amassed a huge wealth...
xbdestroya said:bbot said:Someone in the Teamxbox forum made this comment:
"Everyone feared Smaug, but his arrogance and a soft spot on his belly lead to his doom.
He was ended with a single arrow."
Would it make sense then for me to mention that Waternoose (MS' chip) fell in love with a mad scheme for power and wealth and was eventually discredited and put behind bars?
bbot said:Fafalada said:"He was ended with a single arrow."
... but only after he lived for a couple thousand years and amassed a huge wealth...
Was IBM trying to point out that cell has a serious weak point?
bbot said:xbdestroya said:bbot said:Someone in the Teamxbox forum made this comment:
"Everyone feared Smaug, but his arrogance and a soft spot on his belly lead to his doom.
He was ended with a single arrow."
Would it make sense then for me to mention that Waternoose (MS' chip) fell in love with a mad scheme for power and wealth and was eventually discredited and put behind bars?
I didn't see the movie. Please tell me more.
Titanio said:bbot said:Fafalada said:"He was ended with a single arrow."
... but only after he lived for a couple thousand years and amassed a huge wealth...
Was IBM trying to point out that cell has a serious weak point?
Are you serious?
xbdestroya said:bbot said:xbdestroya said:bbot said:Someone in the Teamxbox forum made this comment:
"Everyone feared Smaug, but his arrogance and a soft spot on his belly lead to his doom.
He was ended with a single arrow."
Would it make sense then for me to mention that Waternoose (MS' chip) fell in love with a mad scheme for power and wealth and was eventually discredited and put behind bars?
I didn't see the movie. Please tell me more.
Well, what I told you already pretty much sums it up.
Suffice to say that if you want context, you might as well watch the movie. (Monsters, Inc.)
(he's the main villain though, to give it all away)
and it seems as though MS went with IBM 's suggestion...bbot said:Well, if you read the Nikkei article, you know that IBM originally suggested an multi PowerPC core design. which was turnd down by Sony. Toshiba's design had no PowerPC, which pissed IBM off. So eventually a compromise was reached where one POwerPC core (PPE) was included. Perhaps IBM was still unhappy that more PowerPC cores weren't included.
bbot said:Titanio said:bbot said:Fafalada said:"He was ended with a single arrow."
... but only after he lived for a couple thousand years and amassed a huge wealth...
Was IBM trying to point out that cell has a serious weak point?
Are you serious?
Well, if you read the Nikkei article, you know that IBM originally suggested an multi PowerPC core design. which was turnd down by Sony. Toshiba's design had no PowerPC, which pissed IBM off. So eventually a compromise was reached where one POwerPC core (PPE) was included. Perhaps IBM was still unhappy that more PowerPC cores weren't included.
and it seems as though MS went with IBM 's suggestion...
yupMegadrive1988 said:so the CPUs for next gen consoles are: Smaug, Waternoose and Broadway.
although Broadway might be Nintendo's codename and not IBM's, maybe IBM has their own codename for Revolution's CPU.
Smaug - RSX | Waternoose - Xenos | Broadway - Hollywood
Well it's "pretty safe" to say RSX's codename was G70, right?Shifty Geezer said:Are RSX and Xenos the codenames of the chips? eg. Smaug WAS Smaug, but is now Cell - PS3 has Cell and RSX. Smaug and Waternoose arten't official designations, unlike Xenos, Broadway, RSX and Hollywood.
Yes yes that is precisely it, they are pointing out that Cell will be a huge financial success for about thousand years to come, after which its weakness will eventually be found out.bbot said:Was IBM trying to point out that cell has a serious weak point?