McAfee doesn't, neither does AVG or the WinXP firewall AFAIK... So what's everyone using?
How much traffic do you use on the net a day.
- Thread starter bloodbob
- Start date
McAfee doesn't, neither does AVG or the WinXP firewall AFAIK... So what's everyone using?
You ready for it....
Bigpond!
I think i'm that one-in-a-million lucky customer who gets everything they could ever want. When I switched from 512/128 to 1.5/256, they actually switched me to an 8mb plan for a good 3 months. In the end I had to call for something that needed fixing in regards to an email account issue, and the way the system worked they just couldn't do it without noticing the discrepancy. When asked if I knew, I just said "Huh? What's that?" and they 'fixed' it
Still, unlimited is unlimited is unlimited, and i'm a happy camper.
On 1.5mbit.
20mbit connection here, and i average maybe a gig a month
Usenet hurts my brain. I spent 3 hours in at work the other day just finding a client, then another hour finding servers to get on...then 30 minutes finding something to download, then 3 years trying to work out how to download all of it, because despite it telling me that everything was linked, it wasn't.
Why can't it just be simple. Download generic client, click join server from list, search trough all available files, download what you want. But instead you get some jumbly ugly-ass client that's so horrible to try and navigate you'd rather just commit suicide.
What the heck am I missing? Do people just put up with this crap because you get good speeds?
Why can't it just be simple. Download generic client, click join server from list, search trough all available files, download what you want. But instead you get some jumbly ugly-ass client that's so horrible to try and navigate you'd rather just commit suicide.
What the heck am I missing? Do people just put up with this crap because you get good speeds?
It's real simple. There are websites that let you easily download stuff without having to mess with headers yourself and after that there are clients that automate the process of downloading and repairing and extracting and then deleting what isn't needed anymore. I have a good guide on how to use Usenet. You can find my guide over at Rage3D. Searching by my username and for Usenet guide should have it pop up for you. There's also the site Slyck where you can find a guide on Usenet too and a forum.Usenet hurts my brain. I spent 3 hours in at work the other day just finding a client, then another hour finding servers to get on...then 30 minutes finding something to download, then 3 years trying to work out how to download all of it, because despite it telling me that everything was linked, it wasn't.
Why can't it just be simple. Download generic client, click join server from list, search trough all available files, download what you want. But instead you get some jumbly ugly-ass client that's so horrible to try and navigate you'd rather just commit suicide.
What the heck am I missing? Do people just put up with this crap because you get good speeds?
Last edited by a moderator:
The Best Usenet program out there is AltBinz. It's the Usenet equivalent of uTorrent. You configure your server(s), connect, and have it watch a directory for NZB files. You download the NZB files from other sites or search using the built-in supported sites. The program does all the rest. It will grab the PAR/PAR2 file first, then the main file, perform PAR checking, grab any additional PAR files needed, repair the archive, and optionally extract it to a configured location.
It uses very minimal resources. At full speed (1608-2048 KBit/sec) and program window open it never used more than 32 Meg of memory. When it was finished pulling everything down, it dropped down to 9 Meg. When minimized it dropped down to 2.1 Meg and when restored went to 8 Meg.
It uses very minimal resources. At full speed (1608-2048 KBit/sec) and program window open it never used more than 32 Meg of memory. When it was finished pulling everything down, it dropped down to 9 Meg. When minimized it dropped down to 2.1 Meg and when restored went to 8 Meg.
How big library is there with NZB files?
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.
Legend
There's quite a few NZB indexers our there, so rather than waiting for a post with a NZB, they collect all the headers, and then generate a NZB on-the-fly from whatever headers you choose. You choose what you want based on the results output from the search engine, and then just use the generated NZB (which is just a list of message-ids) to ask a usenet server for those specific articles.
It quite different and a lot more focussed than the browsing experience you get when looking at all the headers from the complete contents of a newsgroup.
This does, just installed it to check (havent used it in awhile but remembered it)
http://www.ghostsecurity.com/ghostwall/
I used to use a truly wonderful windows usenet program called "gravity". It wasn't free but, then, nor was it expensive. Unfortunately, IIRC, the company went out of business but they did release their final version for free. I have no idea if it works with the latest Windows versions but I do think it might be worth a try.
That site is an automatic bot indexer and has problems with cryptically named files and sometimes doesn't index some files for some reason. After using a ton of Usenet search sites I came back to the one I used first as the best, the site that created the NZB file. It has the editor reported files which are nicely categorized. You can also search raw Usenet headers directly and another search option is being able to search NZB files that were indexed automatically directly from Usenet.
Yes, but that only works for very recent posts.
Similar threads
