How much better is the R300 image quality?
- Thread starter pascal
- Start date
Hardocp has a gaming review and this comment stuck out out me:
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MzMw
Althought thats only really talking about texturing performance I think it shows that the advancments in the pipelines can make a difference just in texturing. To see some of the other advances we'll have to be looking at pretty complex games and indepth reviews!
ATI had some screen shots of the car showing what the pipeline can do with high precision FP as opposeed to 32bit integer. That HardOCP piece is worth a read though.
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MzMw
Althought thats only really talking about texturing performance I think it shows that the advancments in the pipelines can make a difference just in texturing. To see some of the other advances we'll have to be looking at pretty complex games and indepth reviews!
ATI had some screen shots of the car showing what the pipeline can do with high precision FP as opposeed to 32bit integer. That HardOCP piece is worth a read though.
When You look at page 9 from tomshardware preview, then it seems
the R300 uses (up to) 6x RGMS. Could this be true? This would explain
some of the outstanding image quality the sites report.
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q3/020718/radeon9700-09.html
the R300 uses (up to) 6x RGMS. Could this be true? This would explain
some of the outstanding image quality the sites report.
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q3/020718/radeon9700-09.html
OpenGL guy
Veteran
Up to 6 sample is correct. It looks quite nicemboeller said:
Similar threads
