But what if the advancement is only in efficiency and not raw shading power?gosh said:Yes but the R500(Xenos) is slightly more advanced than R520. R520 is current Gen GPU Architecture while Xenos is next gen ATI architecture
Thanks for the info, Dave.DaveBaumann said:ATI has made no announcements on R520, nor have they given any details as to its expected performance. You won't find any direct comparisons yuet, and its best to remove preconceptions before there is more public discorvery on R520.
Do you remember where you heard that, jvd?jvd said:There are no claims .
I believe i've heard they ported the new ruby demo with hdr to the xenos and it runs it faster than the r520 however .
Not to sure on that.
ralexand said:Do you remember where you heard that, jvd?jvd said:There are no claims .
I believe i've heard they ported the new ruby demo with hdr to the xenos and it runs it faster than the r520 however .
Not to sure on that.
g70?gosh said:ralexand said:Do you remember where you heard that, jvd?jvd said:There are no claims .
I believe i've heard they ported the new ruby demo with hdr to the xenos and it runs it faster than the r520 however .
Not to sure on that.
that slowness may be because the drivers for G70 are now optimized while there are only alpha/beta drivers for R520
Yeah, they showed the Ruby demo on beta hardware at e3. Never read anything about a 520 comparison though but I pretty much stick to the console boards.jvd said:i think on these forums some where . To many threads to remember so i may be wrong . I do remember hearing they ported the ruby demo however
LunchBox said:wasn't the ruby demo made for the R430?
jvd said:There are no claims .
I believe i've heard they ported the new ruby demo with hdr to the xenos and it runs it faster than the r520 however .
Not to sure on that .
I would expect them to be at least on par with each other . The r520 may have the raw pixel fillrate advantage but the x360 was designed for 720p with little performance hit at 4x fsaa . The r520 wasn't .