Richthofen said:
well maybe they do that - maybe not.
Right now the ATI vapoware voucher is worth nothing. They are flying in mass quantities off shelves @ ebay.
That may be so now, but when the game eventually comes out those who has a voucher will get the game.
Which will hopefully be before DN4E is released
Richthofen said:
You don't think you got that voucher for free do you?
Of course you payed for it because without it ATI could have sold their products for a little less. And now the worse side of the story is - this voucher is not included in all ATI based graphics cards sold.
Well, yes, I do think so. Because if they'd have found something else to put in there... They needed something to differentiate the XT's from the rest of the cards, and ended up with HL2. And now Nvidia is bundling CoD if I understand correctly.
It was quite clear from the announcement that it was only supposed to be included in the XT's. And there was another announcement saying that vouchers would be discontiued for the 9600XT in 2004 (not sure what the status is with the 9800XT)
Richthofen said:
I would say this special HL2 deal is the way you should not do it.
Why HL2 got delayed doesn't matter here. It's vapoware and ATI has to take responsibility for it. They were pretty damn fast with beta benchmarks and crappy pr meetings with gabe N (shaders day anyone?) and all people are holding in their hands is a little piece of paper worth nothing at the moment.
How would you do it then? And how is it ATI's responisibility that HL2 isn't released yet?
Had it been an in-house development for ATI, then yes it'd been their responsibility, but to say that they are to blame since Valve didn't release the game is going a bit too far imo. If Nvidia had been the one who'd got a bundling deal with HL2 (ignoring the shader day & poor beta performance), then I wouldn't hold them resposible either. Neither company can conjure up a finished game if the game is far from done.
I don't quite follow your "all they're left with is some worthless paper", but then I don't quite follow your logic that they payed more because of the deal than they would otherwise. The XT's was set for a certain price-point, and I'm quite sure they'd ended up there even without the voucher.
As for the beta performance, well, both IHV's got to play that game and both came out shining compared to the other in their respective beta benchmarks.
Wrt. the crappy pr meetings, I'm sure you can figure that one out yourself.
whql> Well, can you blame them? People will allways spin things in such a way that it looks the best for them.
Besides, I really doubt Valve decided to give away a game with every XT sold, so ATI probably had to pay for that.
As for vouchers, it might be a good idea if you could claim it in certain stores instead of having to send it in, then wait for the company to ship the game to you. This would require a lot more work logisticly for the company offering the vouchers (sending out a certain amount of games, but not too many since not everyone will be claiming theirs/they are limited to 3 of 9 different games), but once such a system is in place it shouldn't be too hard to keep it running.