Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) (SARS-CoV-2) [2020]

First school day in some parts of Germany as well...a bit worried to be honest.

In Germany, we have again a spread factor of over 1.0 after reducing the lockdown...doesn‘t feel good.
 
iroboto said:
can't believe we can't clear off the remaining few cases in Canada. What the fuck.. Seriously
Click to expand...

You haven't seen the idiots holding anti-mask rallies? Perhaps the people who thought it would be swell to hold a party for 200 of their closest friends?

Saskatchewan has seen most of its numbers in hutterite colonies in the last month. And due to that have reached new peaks in hospitalizations in the province. That's still only 17 people, but it's not going away as long as people refuse to take it seriously.
 
AlphaWolf said:
You haven't seen the idiots holding anti-mask rallies? Perhaps the people who thought it would be swell to hold a party for 200 of their closest friends?

Saskatchewan has seen most of its numbers in hutterite colonies in the last month. And due to that have reached new peaks in hospitalizations in the province. That's still only 17 people, but it's not going away as long as people refuse to take it seriously.
Click to expand...
sigh =(
I've actually thought most of the issues with Canada's covid has been with us in Ontario and Quebec.
 
Ohio is at 20.1K new tests.
Ohio is at +1143 new cases, with Cuyahoga County at +128 new cases.
Test Positivity rate is around 5.67% for these new tests.

New cases and hospitalizations are ~ 25% more than the past three days but still lower than most of last week's numbers. Hopefully tomorrow and the rest of this week is lower and doesn't trend higher.

Here is the trends which is using reported date and not arbitrary and incorrectly identified user reported onset date taken from https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/dashboards/current-trends

upload_2020-8-4_16-29-57.png

Here is the raw data for the last few days:

upload_2020-8-4_16-29-21.png

Code: 
Date; Total Tests; New Tests; Tests per 1M Population; Total Cases; Cuyahoga County Cases; Hospitalizations; Total Deaths; New Cases; New Hospitalizations; New Deaths
2020-07-16;    1,084,732;    26,133;    92,799;    70,601;    9,985;    9,324;    3,103;    1,290;    115;    28
2020-07-17 1,112,019 27,287 95,134 72,280 10,215 9,445 3,112 1,679 121 9
2020-07-18 1,134,298 22,279 97,040 73,822 10,438 9,513 3,132 1,542 68 20
2020-07-19 1,158,737 24,439 99,131 74,932 10,553 9,555 3,174 1,110 42 42
2020-07-20 1,177,696 18,959 100,753 76,168 10,713 9,610 3,189 1,236 55 15
2020-07-21 1,195,771 18,075 102,299 77,215 10,828 9,736 3,219 1,047 126 30
2020-07-22 1,217,262 21,491 104,137 78,742 11,015 9,864 3,235 1,527 128 16
2020-07-23 1,240,659 23,397 106,139 80,186 11,206 9,968 3,256 1,444 104 21
2020-07-24 1,263,191 22,532 108,067 81,746 11,404 10,072 3,297 1,560 104 41
2020-07-25 1,289,373 26,182 110,307 83,184 11,584 10,145 3,297 1,438 73 0
2020-07-26 1,321,931 32,558 113,092 84,073 11,697 10,199 3,307 889 54 10
2020-07-27 1,339,549 17,618 114,599 85,177 11,788 10,285 3,344 1,104 86 37
2020-07-28 1,394,132 54,583 119,269 86,497 11,938 10,425 3,382 1,320 140 38
2020-07-29 1,416,157 22,025 121,153 87,893 12,088 10,553 3,422 1,396 128 40
2020-07-30 1,441,708 25,551 123,339 89,626 12,212 10,678 3,442 1,733 125 20
2020-07-31 1,463,508 21,800 125,204 91,159 12,399 10,790 3,489 1,533 112 47
2020-08-01 1,488,034 24,526 127,302 92,087 12,518 10,857 3,515 928 67 26
2020-08-02 1,512,649 24,615 129,408 93,031 12,646 10,900 3,529 944 43 14
2020-08-03 1,530,577 17,928 130,942 93,963 12,753 10,992 3,539 932 92 10
2020-08-04 1,550,747 20,170 132,667 95,106 12,881 11,119 3,570 1,143 127 31
 
2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) for Dallas County Texas
https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/2019-novel-coronavirus.php

August 4, 2020 - 52,131 confirmed cases - 722 deaths

52,131 confirmed cases up 641 and thirty one new deaths
those 641 new cases represent a 1.2% increase over the last day

Increases (by percent) since March 27, 2020 :
21.0%, 19.6%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 14.9%
-- Month of April 2020 --
15.8%, 13.7%, 10.8%, 10.2%, 9.6%, 3.9%, 9.2%, 5.0%, 8.2%, 7.3%, 7.0%, 4.8%, 3.8%, 5.0%, 5.8%,
4.0%, 6.0%, 6.1%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.1%, 3.0%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 3.6%, 3.0%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 5.3%
-- Month of May 2020 --
5.3%, 4.9%, 6.0%, 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.3%, 5.2%, 4.9%, 4.7%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.8%, 3.6%, 2.9%, 3.0%,
2.8%, 3.0%, 2.9%, 2.4%, 2.3%, 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 2.1%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.3%
-- Month of June 2020 --
2.2%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.6%, 2.7%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.4%, 2.4%, 2.4%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.1%,
2.1%, 2.8%, 2.6%, 2.4%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.7%, 2.6%, 2.2%, 2.2%, 2.7%, 2.9%, 2.9%, 2.8%, 2.9%
-- Month of July 2020 --
2.5%, 3.2%, 4.8%, 4.7%, 4.3%, 4.7%, 4.0%, 3.7%, 4.1%, 3.8%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.3%, 2.9%, 2.9%, 2.8%,
3.1%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 2.5%, 1.7%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 1.5%, 2.8%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 1.7%, 1.5%, 1.1%, 1.4%
-- Month of August 2020 --
1.2%, 1.0%, 0.7% and now 1.2%

Increases (by count) since March 27, 2020 :
+64, +72, +49, +61, +82
-- Month of April 2020 --
+100, +100, +90, +94, +97. +43, +106, +63, +108, +105, +107, +79, +65, +89, +109,
+80, +124, +134, +104, +84, +90, +81, +80, +71, +75, +105, +91, +135, +112, +179
-- Month of May 2020 --
+187, +181, +234, +237, +253, +246, +251, +249, +250, +251, +253, +236, +243, +235, +199, +214,
+205, +224, +225, +186, +183, +204, +172, +178, +171, +190, +197, +202, +200, +219, +228
-- Month of June 2020 --
+228, +257, +239, +285, +298, +289, +263, +254, +298, +300, +312, +328, +345, +302, +305,
+306, +413, +392, +394, +395, +408, +454, +445, +391, +403, +496, +561, +570, +572, +601
-- Month of July 2020 --
+544, +708, +1,085, +1,103, +1,062, +1,214, +1,077, +1,029, +1,201, +1,164, +1,101, +1,174, +1,114, +1,000, +1,055, +1,027,
+1,195, +1,031, +1,044, +1,026, +734, +413, +648, +659, +1,267, +800, +426, +789, +704, +537, +707
-- Month of August 2020 --
+614, +518, +382 and now +641

As of 11:00am August 4, 2020, Dallas County Health and Human Services is reporting 641 additional confirmed cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), bringing the total confirmed case count in Dallas County to 52,131, including 722 confirmed deaths.

The additional 31 confirmed deaths being reported today include:

  • A man in his 20’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 30’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He expired in an area hospital ED, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 30’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been hospitalized, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 40’s who was a resident of the City of Garland. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 50’s who was a resident of the City of Grand Prairie. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 50’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 60’s who was a resident of the City of Cedar Hill. She had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Mesquite. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Cockrell Hill. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Irving. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 60’s who was a resident of the City of Mesquite. She had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She expired in an area hospital ED, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of DeSoto. He had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 70’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 70’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. She expired in the facility.
  • A man in his 70’s who was a resident of the City of Garland. He had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 70’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Mesquite. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of the City of Rowlett. She had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of the City of Rowlett. She had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. She expired in the facility, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 80’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Cedar Hill. He had been hospitalized.
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. She expired in the facility.
  • A man in his 80’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. He had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 90’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. She expired in the facility, and had underlying high risk health conditions
  • A woman in her 90’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Dallas. She expired in the facility, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 90’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
Over 2,340 children under 18 years of age have been diagnosed with confirmed COVID-19 since July 1st. During this time frame, 61 children have been hospitalized for COVID-19. Of all confirmed cases requiring hospitalization to date, more than two-thirds have been under 65 years of age. Diabetes has been an underlying high-risk health condition reported in about a third of all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

The percentage of respiratory specimens testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 remains high, with about 19% of symptomatic patients presenting to area hospitals testing positive in week 30. Of cases requiring hospitalization who reported employment, over 80% have been critical infrastructure workers, with a broad range of affected occupational sectors, including: healthcare, transportation, food and agriculture, public works, finance, communications, clergy, first-responders and other essential functions.

Of the total confirmed deaths reported to date, about 28% have been associated with long-term care facilities. A total of 1,678 probable cases have been reported to date in Dallas County residents, including 3 probable deaths from COVID-19.
Click to expand...
 
State of Texas complete COVID-19 data breakdown

75af1a2d-68d9-450a-9ce9-ccd60b8fbfe3.png


https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/0d8bdf9be927459d9cb11b9eaef6101

Data as of 8/4/2020 @3:45 PM:

Total Viral Tests: 3,884,848 (Up +50,262)

Cases Reported: 451,181 (Up +9,167)

Texas is actively suppressing Positive Cases from FDA-approved "highly accurate" antigen tests and the daily case increases going forward are suspect.

Fatalities: 7,261 (Up + 245)

Texas tests per 1M population are 144,097 (Up +1,203) which places Texas as the 13th worst State.

Click this link: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us and on the page click the Tests / 1M pop column twice to sort from worst to first

They are using roughly 28.996 million as the population of Texas.

Texas is still mixing Viral and Antibody Tests in the worldometers report on total test numbers which reports 4,143,342 tests which is inflated by 308,756 Antibody Tests.

As of today the real number of Total Viral Tests for Texas is 3,884,848 which works out to be 133,979 per 1M population so Texas is really the 11th worst state in testing
 
Laurent06 said:
That's the same in France. And we have the same retards as in the US who think that wearing a mask is some conspiracy and/or break their freedom. What the hell is Darwin doing? :(
Click to expand...
Darwinism stopped working once we got to a 98% successful birthrate. With a very low mortality rate and a very long life span.
 
iroboto said:
Darwinism stopped working once we got to a 98% successful birthrate. With a very low mortality rate and a very long life span.
Click to expand...

I think that's why they created the various YouTube / SnapChat / TikTok Challenges. :devilish:
 
Ohio is at 18.7K new tests.
Ohio is at +1199 new cases, with Cuyahoga County at +130 new cases.
Test Positivity rate is around 6.40% for these new tests.

New cases and hospitalizations are ~ 25% more than Saturday/Sunday/Monday but still lower than most of last week's numbers. Test positivity is back in the 6.4% range, so I'm going to assume the lower weekend numbers were an anomaly and the weekday numbers are the norm.

Here is the trends which is using reported date and not arbitrary and incorrectly identified user reported onset date taken from https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/dashboards/current-trends

upload_2020-8-5_14-23-27.png

Here is the raw data for the last few days:

upload_2020-8-5_14-22-39.png

Code: 
Date; Total Tests; New Tests; Tests per 1M Population; Total Cases; Cuyahoga County Cases; Hospitalizations; Total Deaths; New Cases; New Hospitalizations; New Deaths
2020-07-17 1,112,019 27,287 95,134 72,280 10,215 9,445 3,112 1,679 121 9
2020-07-18 1,134,298 22,279 97,040 73,822 10,438 9,513 3,132 1,542 68 20
2020-07-19 1,158,737 24,439 99,131 74,932 10,553 9,555 3,174 1,110 42 42
2020-07-20 1,177,696 18,959 100,753 76,168 10,713 9,610 3,189 1,236 55 15
2020-07-21 1,195,771 18,075 102,299 77,215 10,828 9,736 3,219 1,047 126 30
2020-07-22 1,217,262 21,491 104,137 78,742 11,015 9,864 3,235 1,527 128 16
2020-07-23 1,240,659 23,397 106,139 80,186 11,206 9,968 3,256 1,444 104 21
2020-07-24 1,263,191 22,532 108,067 81,746 11,404 10,072 3,297 1,560 104 41
2020-07-25 1,289,373 26,182 110,307 83,184 11,584 10,145 3,297 1,438 73 0
2020-07-26 1,321,931 32,558 113,092 84,073 11,697 10,199 3,307 889 54 10
2020-07-27 1,339,549 17,618 114,599 85,177 11,788 10,285 3,344 1,104 86 37
2020-07-28 1,394,132 54,583 119,269 86,497 11,938 10,425 3,382 1,320 140 38
2020-07-29 1,416,157 22,025 121,153 87,893 12,088 10,553 3,422 1,396 128 40
2020-07-30 1,441,708 25,551 123,339 89,626 12,212 10,678 3,442 1,733 125 20
2020-07-31 1,463,508 21,800 125,204 91,159 12,399 10,790 3,489 1,533 112 47
2020-08-01 1,488,034 24,526 127,302 92,087 12,518 10,857 3,515 928 67 26
2020-08-02 1,512,649 24,615 129,408 93,031 12,646 10,900 3,529 944 43 14
2020-08-03 1,530,577 17,928 130,942 93,963 12,753 10,992 3,539 932 92 10
2020-08-04 1,550,747 20,170 132,667 95,106 12,881 11,119 3,570 1,143 127 31
2020-08-05 1,569,479 18,732 134,270 96,305 13,011 11,231 3,596 1,199 112 26
 
There were some potentially bad developments here in Taiwan. After months of no local transmissions, some weird cases are starting to show. Basically, some foreigners were found to have antibody or virus before or after going back to their own countries, and in some case there's no trace of how they got infected.

The first case was a Japanese national who was found to be infected after going back to Japan. However, a subsequent check on all potential contacts in Taiwan found no infection.
The second case was a Belgian who had been in Taiwan for months, and found to have antibody before going back to Belgium. In this case, he said he was having some possible COVID-19 symptoms (e.g. loss of smell) before coming to Taiwan, but that was quite a few months ago. The tracing of possible contacts is still under way.
The worry is that if a asymptomatic person could transmit to other people, it'd be very difficult to contain the virus as a single "super-spreader" without symptoms be able to spread the virus to many people, and because very few people in Taiwan has any exposure to the virus, it could be devastating if a super-spreader somehow managed to get in.
Another problem is that, as in everywhere else, people are starting to get impatient and many tourist attractions are now filled with people. The rate of wearing face mask is also going down. Of course, it's still required to wear a face mask when riding on a bus or a subway train, so it's probably not that bad. I have heard that movie theaters now also require wearing face masks.
 
were these the better than n95 masks that Doug Ford was talking about? after US intercepted our supply of n95 masks from 3M?
 
2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) for Dallas County Texas
https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/2019-novel-coronavirus.php

August 5, 2020 - 52,639 confirmed cases - 726 deaths

52,639 confirmed cases up 508 and four new deaths
those 508 new cases represent a 1.0% increase over the last day

Increases (by percent) since March 27, 2020 :
21.0%, 19.6%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 14.9%
-- Month of April 2020 --
15.8%, 13.7%, 10.8%, 10.2%, 9.6%, 3.9%, 9.2%, 5.0%, 8.2%, 7.3%, 7.0%, 4.8%, 3.8%, 5.0%, 5.8%,
4.0%, 6.0%, 6.1%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.1%, 3.0%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 3.6%, 3.0%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 5.3%
-- Month of May 2020 --
5.3%, 4.9%, 6.0%, 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.3%, 5.2%, 4.9%, 4.7%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.8%, 3.6%, 2.9%, 3.0%,
2.8%, 3.0%, 2.9%, 2.4%, 2.3%, 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 2.1%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.3%
-- Month of June 2020 --
2.2%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.6%, 2.7%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.4%, 2.4%, 2.4%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.1%,
2.1%, 2.8%, 2.6%, 2.4%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.7%, 2.6%, 2.2%, 2.2%, 2.7%, 2.9%, 2.9%, 2.8%, 2.9%
-- Month of July 2020 --
2.5%, 3.2%, 4.8%, 4.7%, 4.3%, 4.7%, 4.0%, 3.7%, 4.1%, 3.8%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.3%, 2.9%, 2.9%, 2.8%,
3.1%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 2.5%, 1.7%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 1.5%, 2.8%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 1.7%, 1.5%, 1.1%, 1.4%
-- Month of August 2020 --
1.2%, 1.0%, 0.7%, 1.2% and now 1.0%

Increases (by count) since March 27, 2020 :
+64, +72, +49, +61, +82
-- Month of April 2020 --
+100, +100, +90, +94, +97. +43, +106, +63, +108, +105, +107, +79, +65, +89, +109,
+80, +124, +134, +104, +84, +90, +81, +80, +71, +75, +105, +91, +135, +112, +179
-- Month of May 2020 --
+187, +181, +234, +237, +253, +246, +251, +249, +250, +251, +253, +236, +243, +235, +199, +214,
+205, +224, +225, +186, +183, +204, +172, +178, +171, +190, +197, +202, +200, +219, +228
-- Month of June 2020 --
+228, +257, +239, +285, +298, +289, +263, +254, +298, +300, +312, +328, +345, +302, +305,
+306, +413, +392, +394, +395, +408, +454, +445, +391, +403, +496, +561, +570, +572, +601
-- Month of July 2020 --
+544, +708, +1,085, +1,103, +1,062, +1,214, +1,077, +1,029, +1,201, +1,164, +1,101, +1,174, +1,114, +1,000, +1,055, +1,027,
+1,195, +1,031, +1,044, +1,026, +734, +413, +648, +659, +1,267, +800, +426, +789, +704, +537, +707
-- Month of August 2020 --
+614, +518, +382, +641 and now +508

As of 11:00am August 5, 2020, Dallas County Health and Human Services is reporting 508 additional confirmed cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), bringing the total confirmed case count in Dallas County to 52,639, including 726 confirmed deaths.

The additional 4 confirmed deaths being reported today include:

  • A man in his 40’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been hospitalized, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 40’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 60’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 90’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Irving. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.

Over 2,340 children under 18 years of age have been diagnosed with confirmed COVID-19 since July 1st. During this timeframe, 61 children have been hospitalized for COVID-19. Of all confirmed cases requiring hospitalization to date, more than two-thirds have been under 65 years of age. Diabetes has been an underlying high-risk health condition reported in about a third of all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

The percentage of respiratory specimens testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 remains high, with about 19% of symptomatic patients presenting to area hospitals testing positive in week 30. Of cases requiring hospitalization who reported employment, over 80% have been critical infrastructure workers, with a broad range of affected occupational sectors, including: healthcare, transportation, food and agriculture, public works, finance, communications, clergy, first responders and other essential functions.

Of the total confirmed deaths reported to date, about 28% have been associated with long-term care facilities. A total of 1,678 probable cases have been reported to date in Dallas County residents, including 3 probable deaths from COVID-19.
Click to expand...
 
State of Texas complete COVID-19 data breakdown

75af1a2d-68d9-450a-9ce9-ccd60b8fbfe3.png


https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/0d8bdf9be927459d9cb11b9eaef6101

Data as of 8/5/2020 @3:30 PM:

Total Viral Tests: 3,908,235 (Up +23,387)

Cases Reported: 459,887 (Up +8,706 )

Texas is actively suppressing Positive Cases from FDA-approved "highly accurate" antigen tests and the daily case increases going forward are suspect.

Fatalities: 7,497 (Up +236)

Texas tests per 1M population are 145,584 (Up +1,487) which places Texas as the 14th worst State.

Click this link: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us and on the page click the Tests / 1M pop column twice to sort from worst to first

They are using roughly 28.996 million as the population of Texas.

Texas is still mixing Viral and Antibody Tests in the worldometers report on total test numbers which reports 4,221,329 tests which is inflated by 313,094 Antibody Tests.

As of today the real number of Total Viral Tests for Texas is 3,908,235 which works out to be 134,785 per 1M population so Texas is really the 11th worst state in testing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top