Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) (SARS-CoV-2) [2020]

So Florida barely squeaks below 1K with 966 cases, but that's 6 days averaging over 1.2K new cases.
 
2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) for Dallas County Texas
https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/2019-novel-coronavirus.php

June 8, 2020 - 12,347 confirmed cases - 264 deaths

12,347 confirmed cases up 254 and no new deaths
those 254 new cases represent a 2.1% increase over the last day

Increases (by percent) over the last 74 days:
21.0%, 19.6%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 14.9%
-- Month of April 2020 --
15.8%, 13.7%, 10.8%, 10.2%, 9.6%, 3.9%, 9.2%, 5.0%, 8.2%, 7.3%, 7.0%, 4.8%, 3.8%, 5.0%, 5.8%,
4.0%, 6.0%, 6.1%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.1%, 3.0%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 3.6%, 3.0%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 5.3%
-- Month of May 2020 --
5.3%, 4.9%, 6.0%, 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.3%, 5.2%, 4.9%, 4.7%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.8%, 3.6%, 2.9%, 3.0%,
2.8%, 3.0%, 2.9%, 2.4%, 2.3%, 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 2.1%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.3%
-- Month of June 2020 --
2.2%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.6%, 2.7%, 2.5%, 2.2% and now 2.1%

Increases (by count) over the last 74 days:
+64, +72, +49, +61, +82
-- Month of April 2020 --
+100, +100, +90, +94, +97. +43, +106, +63, +108, +105, +107, +79, +65, +89, +109,
+80, +124, +134, +104, +84, +90, +81, +80, +71, +75, +105, +91, +135, +112, +179
-- Month of May 2020 --
+187, +181, +234, +237, +253, +246, +251, +249, +250, +251, +253, +236, +243, +235, +199, +214,
+205, +224, +225, +186, +183, +204, +172, +178, +171, +190, +197, +202, +200, +219, +228
-- Month of June 2020 --
+228, +257, +239, +285, +298, +289, +263 and now +254

As of 11:00 am June 8, 2020, DCHHS is reporting 254 additional positive cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), bringing the total case count in Dallas County to 12,347, including 264 deaths. No additional deaths were reported.

Of cases requiring hospitalization who reported employment, over 80% have been critical infrastructure workers, with a broad range of affected occupational sectors, including: healthcare, transportation, food and agriculture, public works, finance, communications, clergy, first responders and other essential functions.

Of cases requiring hospitalization, more than two-thirds have been under 65 years of age, and about half do not have any high-risk chronic health conditions. Diabetes has been an underlying high-risk health condition reported in about a third of all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Of the 264 total deaths reported to date, over a third have been associated with long-term care facilities.
Click to expand...
 
State of Texas complete COVID-19 data breakdown

75af1a2d-68d9-450a-9ce9-ccd60b8fbfe3.png


https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/0d8bdf9be927459d9cb11b9eaef6101

Data as of 6/8/2020 @7:40 PM:

Total Tests: 1,286,139 (Up +30,240)

Total Viral Tests: 1,120,316 (Up +19,870) : Of Today's Tests only 67.7% were Viral Tests. Not Good.

Only 87.1% of Total Tests are Viral Tests the other 12.9% of tests are the useless Antibody Tests

Cases Reported: 75,616 (Up +638)

Fatalities: 1,836 (Up +6)

Texas tests per 1M population are 44,356 (Up +1,043) which places Texas as the 8th worst State. Up one place from yesterday.

Click this link: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us

and on the page click the Tests / 1M pop column to sort from worst to first

They are using roughly 28.996 million as the population of Texas.

Texas is mixing Viral and Antibody Tests in the total test numbers which is very bad as Antibody Tests are useless in determining if someone has the Coronavirus.

As of today the real number of Total Viral Tests for Texas is 1,120,316 which works out to be 38,637 per 1M population so Texas is really the 4th worst state in testing
 
Last edited:
Ohio's testing is up at 13.5K, but averaging closer to 10K daily tests which is pathetic to what they had planned in May. The trends continue to be on the lower side but hospitalizations rose to the average. Ohio continues to be lucky despite the conditions.

Here is the trends which is using reported date and not arbitrary and incorrectly identified user reported onset date. This graphic is resized by ~ 75% and taken from the State's Current Trends page: https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/dashboards/current-trends

upload_2020-6-9_14-17-48.png

Here is the raw data for the last few days:

upload_2020-6-9_14-19-15.png

Code: 
Date; Total Tests; New Tests; Tests per 1M Population; Total Cases; Cuyahoga County Cases; Hospitalizations; Total Deaths; New Cases; New Hospitalizations; New Deaths
2020-05-19; 277,602; 7,561; 23,749; 28,952; 3,463; 5,117; 1,720; 498; 119; 63
2020-05-20; 287,609; 10,007; 24,605; 29,436; 3,512; 5,198; 1,781; 484; 81; 61
2020-05-21; 297,085; 9,476; 25,416; 30,167; 3,667; 5,295; 1,836; 731; 97; 55
2020-05-22; 305,764; 8,679; 26,158; 30,794; 3,762; 5,379; 1,872; 627; 84; 36
2020-05-23; 314,374; 8,610; 26,895; 31,408; 3,851; 5,437; 1,956; 614; 58; 84
2020-05-24; 322,419; 8,045; 27,583; 31,911; 3,927; 5,476; 1,969; 503; 39; 13
2020-05-25; 330,334; 7,915; 28,260; 32,477; 3,963; 5,511; 1,987; 566; 35; 18
2020-05-26; 337,221; 6,887; 28,849; 33,006; 4,060; 5,579; 2,002; 529; 68; 15
2020-05-27; 347,477;10,256; 29,727; 33,439; 4,137; 5,700; 2,044; 433; 121; 42
2020-05-28;    357,722;    10,245;    30,603;    33,915;    4,211;    5,811;    2,098;    476;    111;    54
2020-05-29;    367,526;    9,804;    31,442;    34,566;    4,318;    5,947;    2,131;    651;    136;    33
2020-05-30;    379,552;    12,026;    32,471;    35,034;    4,369;    6,011;    2,149;    468;    64;    18
2020-05-31;    388,468;    8,916;    33,234;    35,513;    4,444;    6,049;    2,155;    479;    38;    6
2020-06-01;    398,066;    9,598;    34,055;    35,984;    4,508;    6,112;    2,206;    471;    63;    51
2020-06-02;    407,450;    9,384;    34,858;    36,350;    4,581;    6,176;    2,258;    366;    64;    52
2020-06-03;    423,521;    16,071;    36,232;    36,792;    4,669;    6,251;    2,299;    442;    75;    41
2020-06-04;    434,608;    11,087;    37,181;    37,282;    4,732;    6,312;    2,339;    490;    61;    40
2020-06-05;    443,533;    8,925;    37,944;    37,758;    4,789;    6,385;    2,355;    476;    73;    16
2020-06-06;    455,823;    12,290;    38,996;    38,111;    4,827;    6,460;    2,370;    353;    75;    15
2020-06-07;    466,279;    10,456;    39,890;    38,476;    4,858;    6,497;    2,377;    365;    37;    7
2020-06-08;    473,988;    7,709;    40,550;    38,837;    4,910;    6,550;    2,404;    361;    53;    27
2020-06-09;    487,583;    13,595;    41,713;    39,162;    4,939;    6,620;    2,421;    325;    70;    17
 
State of Texas complete COVID-19 data breakdown

75af1a2d-68d9-450a-9ce9-ccd60b8fbfe3.png


https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/0d8bdf9be927459d9cb11b9eaef6101

Data as of 6/9/2020 @3:50 PM:

Total Tests: 1,302,049 (Up +15,910) : Way below the 30,000 daily tests promised. Not Good.

Total Viral Tests: 1,147,355 (Up +27,039)

Only 88.1% of Total Tests are Viral Tests the other 11.9% of tests are the useless Antibody Tests

Cases Reported: 77,253 (Up +1,637)

Fatalities: 1,853 (Up +17)

Texas tests per 1M population are 44,905 (Up +549) which places Texas as the 7th worst State. Down one place from yesterday.

Click this link: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us and on the page click the Tests / 1M pop column to sort from worst to first

They are using roughly 28.996 million as the population of Texas.

Texas is mixing Viral and Antibody Tests in the total test numbers which is very bad as Antibody Tests are useless in determining if someone has the Coronavirus.

As of today the real number of Total Viral Tests for Texas is 1,147,355 which works out to be 39,569 per 1M population so Texas is really the 4th worst state in testing
 
Last edited:
2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) for Dallas County Texas
https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/2019-novel-coronavirus.php

June 9, 2020 - 12,645 confirmed cases - 271 deaths

12,645 confirmed cases up 298 and seven new deaths
those 298 new cases represent a 2.4% increase over the last day

The 298 case increase ties the all time high. Not Good.

Increases (by percent) over the last 75 days:
21.0%, 19.6%, 11.1%, 12.5%, 14.9%
-- Month of April 2020 --
15.8%, 13.7%, 10.8%, 10.2%, 9.6%, 3.9%, 9.2%, 5.0%, 8.2%, 7.3%, 7.0%, 4.8%, 3.8%, 5.0%, 5.8%,
4.0%, 6.0%, 6.1%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.1%, 3.0%, 2.6%, 2.6%, 3.6%, 3.0%, 4.3%, 3.5%, 5.3%
-- Month of May 2020 --
5.3%, 4.9%, 6.0%, 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.3%, 5.2%, 4.9%, 4.7%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.8%, 3.6%, 2.9%, 3.0%,
2.8%, 3.0%, 2.9%, 2.4%, 2.3%, 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 2.1%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.3%
-- Month of June 2020 --
2.2%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.6%, 2.7%, 2.5%, 2.2%, 2.1% and now 2.4%

Increases (by count) over the last 75 days:
+64, +72, +49, +61, +82
-- Month of April 2020 --
+100, +100, +90, +94, +97. +43, +106, +63, +108, +105, +107, +79, +65, +89, +109,
+80, +124, +134, +104, +84, +90, +81, +80, +71, +75, +105, +91, +135, +112, +179
-- Month of May 2020 --
+187, +181, +234, +237, +253, +246, +251, +249, +250, +251, +253, +236, +243, +235, +199, +214,
+205, +224, +225, +186, +183, +204, +172, +178, +171, +190, +197, +202, +200, +219, +228
-- Month of June 2020 --
+228, +257, +239, +285, +298, +289, +263, +254 and now +298

As of 11:00 am June 9, 2020, Dallas County Health and Human Services is reporting 298 additional positive cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), bringing the total case count in Dallas County to 12,645, including 271 deaths.

The additional 7 deaths being reported today include:

  • A woman in her 30’s who was a resident of the City of Mesquite. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 40’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been hospitalized, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 50’s who was a resident of the City of Garland. She expired in an area hospital ED, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 50’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. She had been critically ill in an area hospital, and did not have underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 70’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Irving. He expired in the facility, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A man in his 70’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
  • A woman in her 80’s who was a resident of a long-term care facility in the City of Seagoville. She expired in the facility, and had underlying high risk health conditions.
Of cases requiring hospitalization who reported employment, over 80% have been critical infrastructure workers, with a broad range of affected occupational sectors, including: healthcare, transportation, food and agriculture, public works, finance, communications, clergy, first responders and other essential functions.

Of cases requiring hospitalization, more than two-thirds have been under 65 years of age, and about half do not have any high-risk chronic health conditions. Diabetes has been an underlying high-risk health condition reported in about a third of all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Of the 271 total deaths reported to date, over a third have been associated with long-term care facilities.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Arizona calls for emergency plan as COVID-19 spikes after reopening

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a...s-covid-19-spikes-after-reopening/ar-BB15gpUJ

June 9 (Reuters) - Arizona again told hospitals to activate the coronavirus emergency plans after cases spiked following reopening, turning it into a U.S. virus hotspot along with neighboring Southwest states.

The state's stay-at-home order ended on May 15, and its cases have increased 115 percent since then, leading a former state health chief to warn Arizona may need new social distancing measures or field hospitals.

State health director Cara Christ on Saturday told hospitals to "fully activate" emergency plans - a message she last sent on March 25 - after Arizona's largest medical network Banner Health warned it was reaching its capacity in intensive care unit beds.

"Since May 15, ventilated COVID-19 patients have quadrupled," Banner Health tweeted on Monday, adding it had hit capacity for some patients needing cardiac and respiratory care.
 
Shifty Geezer said:
?

As in, protest parties to get around lockdown?
Click to expand...
The joke is if the cops come to break it up you just say that BLM protests are allowed up to 100 people and that is what we are doing.

Why would anyone believe anything they say at this point. Its either dangrous or its not, the virus doesn't care about protests
 
Is that a real thing? A protest with everyone at a home eating BBQ clearly isn't a real protest - there's no such thing as a 'private protest'. I'd be surprise if people are successfully using that as an excuse to ignore social-distancing requirements at private events.
 
Shifty Geezer said:
?

As in, protest parties to get around lockdown?
Click to expand...
I don't see the point. Most state-side "lockdowns" weren't strongly enforced for private gatherings, assuming there were restrictions. There were a few religious congregations that defied restrictions, and the most serious response was the brief arrest of a pastor or two.

While having a private party probably wouldn't be noticed by the authorities, they've been generally hands-off for relatively large gatherings so long as the gatherings weren't sympathetic to the latest protests. See as an example the limited response to the earlier protests against health measures. Having a party and casually using the latest protests as an excuse seems like it would invite more of a response than the default.

However, the idea that there is instantly-passed legislation allowing the protests or directing their size doesn't seem like a supportable interpretation of the situation. Many areas were already pulling back restrictions or lacked them, and mass protests are acts of defiance to authority, so there's limited energy being put into creating loopholes in a system that is being rejected on a more fundamental level.
 
If you think about it, there is really no way they can enforce lock down orders. They can do things like order certain events and businesses be closed, shut down, by imposing fines, revoking licenses.

But they don’t have the manpower to keep hordes of people from hitting the streets.

The only way is messaging, convincing people of the seriousness of the problem. That worked through the spring, as the streets were empty.

But lockdown fatigue set in and with warm weather, people were going to go outside in greater numbers even without the killing of Floyd igniting protests.

Ironically, it was the effectiveness of the lockdown measures slowing down the spread of infections that has probably convinced many people that we’re past the worst and we can go back towards normalcy.

Study came out that lockdown measures probably prevented over 500 million infections in 6 of the largest counties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top