RussSchultz said:
lol.
Not directed at you Russ:
When I was talking about the Natural Family, in case there were a few that were confused ( I don't know why..) I was talking about the absolute truth of the Father-Mother-Children that absolutely every human being is a creation of.
On the matter of it being learned, well I have argued that indeed I don't know if it is or not. It could be that children are born with the affliction of homosexuality, if could be that they learn it or it could be a little of both. If they are born with it I think sense most parents would rather their child was not homosexual that they could use recent medical advances like homosexuals talk about for reproduction (test tube babies.) to avoid the gene that possibly causes the problem. No responsible parent would allow for their child to be born with that abnormality if they could help it. I am of the mind that children could indeed be forced to fancy homosexuality given the right conditions.
If it is a learned behavior or perversion then we ought to do something about the socializations that enable it.
Before 1981 AIDS was non existent, I believe that this is a result of the significantly lower levels of sexual promiscuity in mid 1950’s and earlier. AIDS takes years to develop serious damage to the immune system, so in reality it is likely the number one contributing factor to the rise of AIDS was the "sexual revolution" which brought us "free sex" (heh, nothing is free and for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.) and "alternative lifestyle" acceptance (homosexuality) not to mention the mushrooming wider variety of STD numbers.
AIDS literally didn't have much of a opportunity without homosexuality and wider promiscuity brought about by the "sexual revolution". AIDS thrives though in the homosexual community as a result of their insistence on using the lower digestive tract as their main boulevard of playing heterosexual sex. The lower intestine is not really well suited for this sort of abuse and bleeding is more common then if one were to engage in vaginal intercourse. The only reason that homosexuals are not still the primary carriers of AIDS in terms of sheer numbers (percentage wise homosexuals are still far more likely to have the virus.) is because the activities of bisexual activity that crossed the virus into the heterosexual community. Sure there are other means like hypodermic needles, butchered monkeys, blood transfusions and the like but the evidence clearly indicates that homosexual activities are the primary culprit for the proliferation of the AIDS virus in N.America. Further the perversion of anal sex has been popularized by the porn industry and now heterosexuals often engage in it. My advice is too anyone I talk to in a candid manner about sex is that they ought not to engage in anal sex, as it is not healthy for the sphincter muscles and this can result in their weakening and possible incontinence particularly if done repeatedly.
Sex education even declares that it is an acceptable (but more risky) alternative to vaginal intercourse. Sex education has its roots in the Swedish education model where radical feminist were actively interested in the breaking of the traditional family so that they may have some form of socialism/egalitarian welfare state. The Swedes found that (in the 50's) if you teach children about sex, premarital birth rates increased. ( heh, imagine that.) But after they discovered this fact they didn't discontinue the practice and the seeds for the "sexual revolution" were planted.
I love how when you point out the fact that it was homosexuals that are the main source of AIDS in the first place (in light of the stats this is exactly the case.) that you ought to go back and get "reeducated", I don't know as it seems a little common sense goes along way here. I dislike brainwashing, common sense gets thrown out the window. Besides we all know the only reason that homosexuals are not pinned for the earlier proliferation of the AIDS virus is because it isn’t nice and creates opposition to their plight.
On the matter of “virginity inspections†in Africa someone brought up. I don’t believe that the government in place is advocating anything of the sort but rather advocating that promiscuity is very bad and that people ought not to do it. I believe that they are even advocating sex within marriage as most acceptable. With that philosophy they have managed to nearly wipe out the AIDS growth rate.
Heh, I detect some logic here.
Dave H said:
I couldn’t agree more, and this is why homosexuals looking for a quick fix can do it and are more promiscus then hetrosexuals.
Oh, more logic. Dave I am afraid that you are making my argument with this post.
Dave H said:
Here though you stray…
Dave H said:
You just got done explaining to me why homosexual males are more promiscuous. ( MSM) What makes you think that those circumstances are not already in place?
Dave H said:
Funny thing is that this goes against nature and would never really be accepted. One of the defining aspects of life is that it reproduces. Let’s reverse the logic here and immediately the truth becomes too apparent. In the above scenario only homosexual relationships are approved of (preposterous as it may be.) and all heterosexual activity severely disapproved of. Well it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that mankind would be non existent. Homosexuality is disapproved of for many reasons by nearly all societies over the course of history, not simply because of the cultures that believe in Christianity. I even personally have distain for a man whom sounds or talks like a woman, I don’t know why, I just do.
Anyhow that is all the time I will waste on this subject today.
