Silent_Buddha
Legend
I'vr brrn trying to make sense out of these apparently contradictory statements:
a "Navi" GPU based on next-generation Radeon™ RDNA gaming architecture including hardware-accelerated raytracing.
a next generation GPU based on the Radeon RDNA gaming architecture including hardware-accelerated ray tracing.
I think
RDNA2 = RDNA1 + hardware RT.
But how can "navi" GPU be a next generation GPU? Maybe Navi GPUs with RDNA2 were so different from regular "navi" that AMD decided to consider them next genration GPU instead.
You're wasting too much time on inexact English marketing statements.
Yes, English is not an exact language. The whole science of Logic was founded in order to get around the logical fallacies that arise from conversation in various languages (English being one of them, obviously).
In other words, depending on a person's viewpoint it's easy to misinterpret what another person has said or has written if it's just using normal language conventions.
This is also why when many people read or listen to the same thing, we end up with multiple interpretations of the material. Just look at how many interpretations there are for the US Constitution (or any other governments founding documents) or the Quran (or any other religious document).
Then again, we wouldn't have funny season with so much speculation before every hardware release if language were a precise method of conveying meaning. Even worse when PR tries to make things deliberately vague in order for people (especially their competitors) to not determine any actual specifications of the product they are generating hype for. And then even worse when they sprinkle it with just enough actual information that people's imaginations run wild.
Regards,
SB