Why? It would be roughly a repeat of last gen.
Huh? I said it seems reasonable/likely...maybe you thought I said not reasonable?
Why? It would be roughly a repeat of last gen.
Huh? I said it seems reasonable/likely...maybe you thought I said not reasonable?
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC. INTRODUCES PLAYSTATION®4 (PS4™)
PS4’s Powerful System Architecture, Social Integration and Intelligent Personalization,
Combined with PlayStation Network with Cloud Technology, Delivers Breakthrough
Gaming Experiences and Completely New Ways to Play
New York City, New York, February 20, 2013– Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCEI) today introduced PlayStation®4 (PS4™), its next generation computer entertainment system that redefines rich and immersive gameplay with powerful graphics and speed, intelligent personalization, deeply integrated social capabilities, and innovative second-screen features. Combined with PlayStation®Network with cloud technology, PS4 offers an expansive gaming ecosystem that is centered on gamers, enabling them to play when, where and how they want. PS4 will be available this holiday season.
・Gamer Focused, Developer Inspired
PS4 was designed from the ground up to ensure that the very best games and the most immersive experiences reach PlayStation gamers. PS4 accomplishes this by enabling the greatest game developers in the world to unlock their creativity and push the boundaries of play through a system that is tuned specifically to their needs.
PS4 also fluidly connects players to the larger world of experiences offered by PlayStation, across the console and mobile spaces, and PlayStation® Network (PSN).
The PS4 system architecture is distinguished by its high performance and ease of development. PS4 is centered around a powerful custom chip that contains eight x86-64 cores and a state of the art graphics processor.
The Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) has been enhanced in a number of ways, principally to allow for easier use of the GPU for general purpose computing (GPGPU) such as physics simulation. The GPU contains a unified array of 18 compute units, which collectively generate 1.84 Teraflops of processing power that can freely be applied to graphics, simulation tasks, or some mixture of the two.
PS4 is equipped with 8 GB of unified system memory, easing game creation and increasing the richness of content achievable on the platform. GDDR5 is used for this memory, giving the system 176 GB/second of bandwidth and providing a further boost to graphics performance.
Well they couldn't hide it. Eventually people will figure out the specs. whether Sony publicizes them or not.
Well they couldn't hide it. Eventually people will figure out the specs. whether Sony publicizes them or not.
Yep. We'll get it another way, but maybe not immediately.
Remember how we confirmed 768 shaders in X1 because that MS video mentioned 768 operations per clock or something...
no mention of toy story graphics.... Clearly fake.SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC. INTRODUCES PLAYSTATION[emoji2400]5 (PS5[emoji769])
4 mere years later the release of our premium console Pro containing 36 compute units we are very proud to announce that we succeeded in equaling the number of compute units in PS5 which will ambitiously contain no less than 36 compute units. Just be happy we didn't reduce the number of CUs, because we were about to include only 28 CUs on PS5, because the Moore's law is actually regressing those days.
We plan to use 36CUs in the 9 next playstation machines to be released up to Playstation 10, included.
Again, see Nintendo. The gaming community will pull apart these machines and spread word and criticism, but the larger buying public won't give a shit. Don't tell them what they don't need to know. If the TF number is smaller, just don't mention it - you don't advertise your shortcomings.Well they couldn't hide it. Eventually people will figure out the specs. whether Sony publicizes them or not.
I guess i remember it wrong because i thought Microsoft didn't hide(because silly Don think Kinect 2 is really something)the TFs.Yep. We'll get it another way, but maybe not immediately.
Remember how we confirmed 768 shaders in X1 because that MS video mentioned 768 operations per clock or something...
That's it...Again, see Nintendo. The gaming community will pull apart these machines and spread word and criticism, but the larger buying public won't give a shit. Don't tell them what they don't need to know. If the TF number is smaller, just don't mention it - you don't advertise your shortcomings.
But will they bang on about the numbers or a more general ‘most powerful console in the world’ as MS did with the Xbox One X (they also dropped the 6TF number left right and centre as well). Now we’ve got the complication of differing efficiencies across different architectures I expect them to drop the numbers and whoever the winner is just claim ‘most powerful).Well the better one will advertise it, but i guess it will be the console war part.
I think they will use everything.But will they bang on about the numbers or a more general ‘most powerful console in the world’ as MS did with the Xbox One X (they also dropped the 6TF number left right and centre as well). Now we’ve got the complication of differing efficiencies across different architectures I expect them to drop the numbers and whoever the winner is just claim ‘most powerful).
Anecdotal but in my experience certain beliefs about power have nothing to do with data too.Again, see Nintendo. The gaming community will pull apart these machines and spread word and criticism, but the larger buying public won't give a shit. Don't tell them what they don't need to know. If the TF number is smaller, just don't mention it - you don't advertise your shortcomings.
So instead of embracing the gaming press and developing a relationship of product promotion, you are going to launch into an adversarial relationship and turn them all into a bunch of investigative reporters on the hunt. How is this a good plan?Again, see Nintendo. The gaming community will pull apart these machines and spread word and criticism, but the larger buying public won't give a shit. Don't tell them what they don't need to know. If the TF number is smaller, just don't mention it - you don't advertise your shortcomings.
Ask Nintendo. What you're suggesting isn't at all how it happens. There's a small niche of gamers who care about specs. They'll eagerly await the DF breakdowns and the magical TF numbers and post how great/rubbish a platform is. The rest won't care. The gaming press will talk about the games and the experiences. They'll repeat the marketing materials provides which talk of all the features and experiences. There's no tragic PR fallout to be suffered here and you don't need superior/equivalent numbers to have a viable product. What's the most popular brand of headphones? Dr. Beats. Is that because they are numerical the best? No, but shoppers don't care and aren't interested. You need a product that's good enough, at the right price, that's well marketed. It doesn't have to be the best to be the most successful. It doesn't even have to be that good as long as you can catch the public's imagination!So instead of embracing the gaming press and developing a relationship of product promotion, you are going to launch into an adversarial relationship and turn them all into a bunch of investigative reporters on the hunt. How is this a good plan?