Although Avalon is a key part of Windows' future, it is something the average computer user will never touch directly. Instead, it's an improved method of dealing with graphics, designed to let developers write snazzier-looking applications.
The preview version works on both Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. However, Microsoft warned developers that the code in the current version is pretty rough. The company recommended that it not be used even on a primary development computer, with bugs likely and a good chance users would eventually have to reinstall their operating system once they were done with the Avalon preview.
Actually it doesn't, it works just "fine" with DX9.0c, or was it even .0bDemirug said:Dave, this is a Avalon preview and not a preview of the new 3D desktop.
The new desktop needs DX 9.L aka WGF 1.0.
Kaotik said:Actually it doesn't, it works just "fine" with DX9.0c, or was it even .0bDemirug said:Dave, this is a Avalon preview and not a preview of the new 3D desktop.
The new desktop needs DX 9.L aka WGF 1.0.
Okay, it doesn't work fine at all, but it works
Here's a shot I took, it's damn buggy, as you can see (the greenish borders should NOT look like that for example, in fact they shouldn't even be there, not to mention the effects are quite jaggy most of the time (running on 9550 128MB 128bit)
I can recheck any time if you want, but I have a strong memory of the DirectX build being the exact same as DX9.0b or DX9.0c on WindowsXPDemirug said:Kaotik said:Actually it doesn't, it works just "fine" with DX9.0c, or was it even .0bDemirug said:Dave, this is a Avalon preview and not a preview of the new 3D desktop.
The new desktop needs DX 9.L aka WGF 1.0.
Okay, it doesn't work fine at all, but it works
Here's a shot I took, it's damn buggy, as you can see (the greenish borders should NOT look like that for example, in fact they shouldn't even be there, not to mention the effects are quite jaggy most of the time (running on 9550 128MB 128bit)
looks like Longhorn. In this case it use DX 9.L.
Kaotik said:I can recheck any time if you want, but I have a strong memory of the DirectX build being the exact same as DX9.0b or DX9.0c on WindowsXPDemirug said:Kaotik said:Actually it doesn't, it works just "fine" with DX9.0c, or was it even .0bDemirug said:Dave, this is a Avalon preview and not a preview of the new 3D desktop.
The new desktop needs DX 9.L aka WGF 1.0.
Okay, it doesn't work fine at all, but it works
Here's a shot I took, it's damn buggy, as you can see (the greenish borders should NOT look like that for example, in fact they shouldn't even be there, not to mention the effects are quite jaggy most of the time (running on 9550 128MB 128bit)
looks like Longhorn. In this case it use DX 9.L.
yeah, thanx for the shot, Kaotikdigitalwanderer said:Thanks Kaotik, that's the first screenshot I've seen of the 3D interface.
I always wondered just what in the heck they were talking about, now I know...thank you.
It's pretty similar indeed, but how many ways there can be to make 3D GUI, which is easy to use etc etcAlthornin said:wow, looks alot like Project Looking Glass from Sun...
http://www.sun.com/software/looking_glass/details.html
val_parthen said:Cool, I was wondering if it actually did anything, lol.
Has it hosed your install yet? Or has it broken anything that you can see? I know it's rough and whatnot, but I don't mind slapping it on my primary install (hell, it's the only DX9-capable box I've got!), but it'd be nice to know if I'm gonna lose my install. :b
Kaotik said:Actually it doesn't, it works just "fine" with DX9.0c, or was it even .0bDemirug said:Dave, this is a Avalon preview and not a preview of the new 3D desktop.
The new desktop needs DX 9.L aka WGF 1.0.
Okay, it doesn't work fine at all, but it works
Here's a shot I took, it's damn buggy, as you can see (the greenish borders should NOT look like that for example, in fact they shouldn't even be there, not to mention the effects are quite jaggy most of the time (running on 9550 128MB 128bit)