Aquamark 3 in B3D Reviews

What title to remove in favour of Aquamark3 for next batch of reviews...?

  • Tomb Raider: Angel Of Darkness (DX9)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • UT2003 (DX7/8)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Wolfenstein: ET (OGL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Serious Sam: Second Encounter (OGL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    116
Cyberon said:
What i really miss is diversity.
Thats the reason i suggested such diverse options like IDV's SpeedTree and X2 Threat rolling demo.
First one _could_ represent a significant future direction in realtime environments, second one sport simply very high-end graphics engine while being significantly different from mainstream.
 
Maybe someone could use Max Payne 2 when benching? Though I don't know if it has any benchmark-options, but Fraps should do the trick. It's not the most shining game technically speaking, but still uses some shaders. VS 1.1/PS1.4 for characters' eyes&skins, VS 1.1/PS1.1 for the "Bullet Time Tone Remap"-effect and VS1.1/PS1.1 for the characters' shadows blur&fade-effects.
 
Using the most popular games as benchmarks is all fine and dandy but there is a diverse taste out there. I would suggest something like an RTS (Rome:Total War is out soon - look at AoM). The other problem is that IHV's (ALL OF THEM) can concentrate on 'optimisations' for a select few games and engines which SOMETIMES nullify any data obtained.

Get rid of RtCW due to the reasons you mention and SS:SE too IMHO.

Use less well known games to 'beat the cheats.' Aquamark3 might be a good choice but I haven't seen it so I can't comment. I would look at www.aceshardware.com (yea I know big mistake referring to another review site, but what the hell we are all grown up here) and have a look at what they do in their reviews for CPU's. One thing to note is that some benchmarks they use in my experience have a very high margin of error.
 
Back
Top