Right in the middle, as I guessed!
The new die should fall between 280 and 284 mm² by my own measurements against RV770.
The new die should fall between 280 and 284 mm² by my own measurements against RV770.
Did anyone else notice the latest version of GPU-Z (which supports RV740 and RV790) report the HD4890 to be 282mm2 compared to the HD4870 being 256mm2?
And what does it say on transistors?
956M just like RV770.
Nice riddle if we take GPU-z infos for granted, isn't it?
But then some people might also be disappointed if those numbers turn out to be true.taking those numbers as hard facts might get some people dissapointed.
GPU-z is just a database. It's not detecting the number of transistors for fuck's sake
Not really. Lower transistor density may be the reason of higher clocks limit.Nice riddle if we take GPU-z infos for granted, isn't it?
Not really. Lower transistor density may be the reason of higher clocks limit.
Nah...Not really. Lower transistor density may be the reason of higher clocks limit.
is that supposed to be you in your best days?
KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
GPU-z is just a database. It's not detecting the number of transistors for fuck's sake
KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
GPU-z is just a database. It's not detecting the number of transistors for fuck's sake
True, but some knowledgeable does provide the numbers for the database - for transistors as well as for die size. And since it's not detecting die-size either…