I think a resounding answer to that question would be: "NO!"
Should I be, and if so, in what cases? Because that is the main criticism I always get, next to talking too much. I should behave more like a manager, to be able to grow.
Small lies, big lies, what's the difference? That the paper is always right and everyone agrees to that vision, no matter? And that sucking up to people is the single best way to raise in any organization? They like you, so you get the benefits?
I'm generally the single one who is saying that it isn't going to work. As in, actually. And I'm generally the only one as well who is offering an alternative in which it will work. Which is only accepted if I give that secretly to a manager and he can proclaim that as his solution, often while including so much politically required crap that it makes it useless.
I think I succeed only about 10% of the time when it's a high profile project. All the other times I get killed, but I'm allowed to stay, because I'm useful. I hate that.
Should I be, and if so, in what cases? Because that is the main criticism I always get, next to talking too much. I should behave more like a manager, to be able to grow.
Small lies, big lies, what's the difference? That the paper is always right and everyone agrees to that vision, no matter? And that sucking up to people is the single best way to raise in any organization? They like you, so you get the benefits?
I'm generally the single one who is saying that it isn't going to work. As in, actually. And I'm generally the only one as well who is offering an alternative in which it will work. Which is only accepted if I give that secretly to a manager and he can proclaim that as his solution, often while including so much politically required crap that it makes it useless.
I think I succeed only about 10% of the time when it's a high profile project. All the other times I get killed, but I'm allowed to stay, because I'm useful. I hate that.